Skip to content

Subgroups

A subgroup HH of GG is a subset H⊆GH \subseteq G that is itself a group under the operation of GG.

Theorem 2.1 (Subgroup Criterion). A non-empty subset H⊆GH \subseteq G is a subgroup if and only if For all a,b∈Ha, b \in H:

  1. a∗b−1∈Ha * b^{-1} \in H (closed under the operation and inverses).

Proof. If HH is a subgroup, closure gives a∗b−1∈Ha * b^{-1} \in H. Conversely, since HH is non-empty, Pick a∈Ha \in H. Then a∗a−1=e∈Ha * a^{-1} = e \in H And e∗a−1=a−1∈He * a^{-1} = a^{-1} \in H. For any a,b∈Ha, b \in H We have b−1∈Hb^{-1} \in H So a∗(b−1)−1=a∗b∈Ha * (b^{-1})^{-1} = a * b \in H Proving closure under the group operation. ■\blacksquare

Corollary 2.2 (Finite Subgroup Criterion). A non-empty finite subset H⊆GH \subseteq G is a subgroup If and only if HH is closed under the group operation.

Example. For any group GG, {e}\{e\} and GG itself are subgroups (the trivial subgroups).

Example. The set SLn(R)SL_n(\mathbb{R}) of n×nn \times n real matrices with determinant 11 is a subgroup of GLn(R)GL_n(\mathbb{R}).

Example. The set AnA_n of even permutations in SnS_n is a subgroup called the alternating group. ∣An∣=n!/2|A_n| = n!/2.

The center of GG is Z(G)={z∈G:zg=gz for all g∈G}Z(G) = \{z \in G : zg = gz \mathrm{\ for\ all\ } g \in G\}.

Proposition 2.3. Z(G)Z(G) is a subgroup of GG.

Proof. e∈Z(G)e \in Z(G). If z1,z2∈Z(G)z_1, z_2 \in Z(G) and g∈Gg \in G Then (z1z2)g=z1(z2g)=z1(gz2)=(z1g)z2=(gz1)z2=g(z1z2)(z_1 z_2)g = z_1(z_2 g) = z_1(g z_2) = (z_1 g)z_2 = (g z_1)z_2 = g(z_1 z_2) So z1z2∈Z(G)z_1 z_2 \in Z(G). Also, zg=gzz g = g z implies g=z−1gzg = z^{-1} g z So gz−1=z−1gg z^{-1} = z^{-1} g Giving z−1∈Z(G)z^{-1} \in Z(G). ■\blacksquare

For g∈Gg \in G The cyclic subgroup generated by gg is

⟨g⟩={gn:n∈Z}\langle g \rangle = \{g^n : n \in \mathbb{Z}\}

Theorem 2.4. Every subgroup of a cyclic group is cyclic.

Proof. Let G=⟨a⟩G = \langle a \rangle and H≤GH \leq G. If H={e}H = \{e\} Then H=⟨e⟩H = \langle e \rangle. Otherwise, let mm be the smallest positive integer with am∈Ha^m \in H. We claim H=⟨am⟩H = \langle a^m \rangle. For any ak∈Ha^k \in H Write k=qm+rk = qm + r with 0≤r<m0 \leq r \lt m. Then ar=ak−qm=ak(am)−q∈Ha^r = a^{k - qm} = a^k (a^m)^{-q} \in H. By minimality of mm, r=0r = 0 So ak=(am)q∈⟨am⟩a^k = (a^m)^q \in \langle a^m \rangle. ■\blacksquare

Theorem 2.5. If G=⟨a⟩G = \langle a \rangle has order nn Then ∣⟨ak⟩∣=n/gcd⁡(n,k)|\langle a^k \rangle| = n / \gcd(n, k).

2.5 Worked Examples: Verifying the Subgroup Criterion

Section titled “2.5 Worked Examples: Verifying the Subgroup Criterion”

Problem. Let G=GL2(R)G = GL_2(\mathbb{R}) and H={A∈G:det⁡(A)=±1}H = \{A \in G : \det(A) = \pm 1\}. Show that H≤GH \leq G.

Solution

Solution. HH is non-empty since I2∈HI_2 \in H (with det⁡(I2)=1\det(I_2) = 1). Let A,B∈HA, B \in H. Then det⁡(AB−1)=det⁡(A)det⁡(B)−1=(±1)(±1)−1=±1\det(AB^{-1}) = \det(A)\det(B)^{-1} = (\pm 1)(\pm 1)^{-1} = \pm 1 So AB−1∈HAB^{-1} \in H. By the subgroup criterion, H≤GH \leq G. ■\blacksquare

Problem. Let G=(Z,+)G = (\mathbb{Z}, +) and H={5k−3m:k,m∈Z}H = \{5k - 3m : k, m \in \mathbb{Z}\}. Show that H=ZH = \mathbb{Z}.

Solution

Solution. First, HH is a subgroup of (Z,+)(\mathbb{Z}, +): it is non-empty (0=5⋅0−3⋅0∈H0 = 5 \cdot 0 - 3 \cdot 0 \in H), And if a=5k1−3m1a = 5k_1 - 3m_1 and b=5k2−3m2b = 5k_2 - 3m_2 Then a−b=5(k1−k2)−3(m1−m2)∈Ha - b = 5(k_1 - k_2) - 3(m_1 - m_2) \in H.

Since gcd⁡(5,3)=1\gcd(5, 3) = 1 By Bezout’s identity there exist k,m∈Zk, m \in \mathbb{Z} with 5k−3m=15k - 3m = 1 So 1∈H1 \in H. Therefore H=⟨1⟩=ZH = \langle 1 \rangle = \mathbb{Z}. ■\blacksquare

Theorem 2.6. If {Hi}i∈I\{H_i\}_{i \in I} is a family of subgroups of GG Then ⋂i∈IHi\bigcap_{i \in I} H_i is a subgroup of GG.

Proof. Since e∈Hie \in H_i for all ii We have e∈⋂i∈IHie \in \bigcap_{i \in I} H_i So the intersection is non-empty. If a,b∈⋂i∈IHia, b \in \bigcap_{i \in I} H_i Then a,b∈Hia, b \in H_i for all ii So ab−1∈Hiab^{-1} \in H_i for all ii (since each HiH_i is a subgroup). Thus ab−1∈⋂i∈IHiab^{-1} \in \bigcap_{i \in I} H_i. By the subgroup criterion, ⋂i∈IHi≤G\bigcap_{i \in I} H_i \leq G. ■\blacksquare

Remark. The union of subgroups need not be a subgroup. For example, in Z\mathbb{Z} ⟨2⟩∪⟨3⟩\langle 2 \rangle \cup \langle 3 \rangle is not a subgroup since 2+3=5∉⟨2⟩∪⟨3⟩2 + 3 = 5 \notin \langle 2 \rangle \cup \langle 3 \rangle.

Let S⊆GS \subseteq G be any subset (possibly empty). The subgroup generated by SS is

⟨S⟩=⋂{H≤G:S⊆H}\langle S \rangle = \bigcap\{H \leq G : S \subseteq H\}

This is the smallest subgroup of GG containing SS And it equals the set of all finite products Of elements of SS and their inverses:

⟨S⟩={s1ϵ1s2ϵ2⋯skϵk:si∈S, ϵi∈{1,−1}, k≥0}\langle S \rangle = \{s_1^{\epsilon_1} s_2^{\epsilon_2} \cdots s_k^{\epsilon_k} : s_i \in S,\ \epsilon_i \in \{1, -1\},\ k \geq 0\}

When S={g1,…,gn}S = \{g_1, \ldots, g_n\} We write ⟨g1,…,gn⟩\langle g_1, \ldots, g_n \rangle.

Example. In S3S_3, ⟨(1 2),(2 3)⟩=S3\langle (1\ 2), (2\ 3) \rangle = S_3 since (1 2)(2 3)=(1 2 3)(1\ 2)(2\ 3) = (1\ 2\ 3), (1 2 3)(1 2)=(1 3)(1\ 2\ 3)(1\ 2) = (1\ 3) And we obtain all six elements.

Example. In D4D_4, ⟨r2,s⟩={e,r2,s,r2s}≅V4\langle r^2, s \rangle = \{e, r^2, s, r^2s\} \cong V_4 (the Klein four-group).

Problem. Show that Sn=⟨(1 2),(1 2 … n)⟩S_n = \langle (1\ 2), (1\ 2\ \ldots\ n) \rangle.

Solution

Solution. Let σ=(1 2 … n)\sigma = (1\ 2\ \ldots\ n) and τ=(1 2)\tau = (1\ 2). For any 1≤i<n1 \leq i \lt n σi−1τσ−(i−1)=(i i+1)\sigma^{i-1}\tau\sigma^{-(i-1)} = (i\ i+1) (conjugation by σ\sigma shifts the transposition). Since adjacent transpositions (i i+1)(i\ i+1) generate SnS_n (every permutation factors into adjacent Transpositions), we have Sn=⟨σ,τ⟩S_n = \langle \sigma, \tau \rangle. ■\blacksquare

A subgroup is a subset of a group that is itself a group under the same operation. The subgroup criterion, ab−1∈Hab^{-1} \in H for all a,b∈Ha, b \in H, packages closure, identity, and inverses into one condition. The cyclic subgroup generated by an element gg consists of all powers of gg: it is the smallest subgroup containing gg, like the orbit of a single rotation. Lagrange’s theorem says the size of any subgroup divides the size of the whole group, which severely limits the possible subgroup structures. Normal subgroups are the ones that are compatible with coset multiplication, enabling quotient groups, the algebraic analogue of factoring out by a symmetry.

Mistake 1: Forgetting to check closure under inverses when verifying subgroups The subgroup criterion requires ab−1∈Hab^{-1} \in H for all a,b∈Ha, b \in H. Students sometimes only check closure under the operation (ab∈Hab \in H) and forget to verify that inverses exist in HH. For example, {1,2,3}\{1, 2, 3\} under multiplication mod 44 is closed but not a subgroup because 22 has no inverse. Always check the full criterion.

Mistake 2: Assuming the identity element is obvious When proving a subset is a subgroup, explicitly verify that the identity element of GG belongs to HH. This is part of the non-empty requirement in the subgroup criterion. For example, {x∈R:x>0}\{x \in \mathbb{R} : x > 0\} under addition does not contain 00 and is not a subgroup of (R,+)(\mathbb{R}, +).

Mistake 3: Confusing quotient groups with cosets A coset gHgH is a set of elements, not a group (unless HH is normal). The quotient group G/HG/H consists of cosets as elements, but its group operation is only well-defined when H⊴GH \trianglelefteq G. Never assume a set of cosets forms a group without first verifying normality of HH.