The Sylow Theorems | Mathematics
7.1 Statement
Section titled “7.1 Statement”Let be a finite group of order where is prime and . A Sylow -subgroup of is a subgroup of order .
Theorem 7.1 (Sylow”s First Theorem). has a Sylow -subgroup.
Theorem 7.2 (Sylow’s Second Theorem). Any two Sylow -subgroups are conjugate.
Theorem 7.3 (Sylow’s Third Theorem). The number of Sylow -subgroups satisfies:
- .
- divides .
7.2 Proof of Sylow’s First Theorem
Section titled “7.2 Proof of Sylow’s First Theorem”Proof. Let with . Let be the set of all subsets of of size . Then . Note that does not divide (this follows from Lucas’s theorem or examining the -adic valuation). acts on by left multiplication. Since is not divisible by Some orbit has size not divisible by . By the orbit-stabilizer theorem, is divisible by . For Left multiplication by is a bijection And since . Since We get So . Thus Giving . Since divides and is divisible by We have And is a Sylow -subgroup.
7.3 Applications
Section titled “7.3 Applications”Proposition 7.4. Every group of order (where are primes with ) Is cyclic.
Proof. By Sylow’s third theorem, and divides . Since So the Sylow -subgroup is normal. Similarly, and Divides . Since , So And the Sylow -subgroup Is normal. Since (their orders are coprime) and We have .
Proposition 7.5. Every group of order (where is prime) is abelian.
Proof. Let . If is cyclic, it is abelian. Otherwise, every non-identity element has Order (by Lagrange). Let and consider with . Then So (the smallest prime dividing ). Pick . Then And since and has order We have Which is abelian.
7.4 Proof of Sylow’s Second Theorem
Section titled “7.4 Proof of Sylow’s Second Theorem”Proof. Let be a Sylow -subgroup of And let be any -subgroup of . acts on the set of left cosets by left multiplication: .
Since is not divisible by And orbits under the -action have sizes Dividing (hence powers of ), the number of fixed points satisfies:
So there exists fixed by Meaning I.e., So .
Taking to be a Sylow -subgroup: So Proving that and are conjugate.
7.5 Proof of Sylow’s Third Theorem
Section titled “7.5 Proof of Sylow’s Third Theorem”Proof. Let be a Sylow -subgroup. acts on the set of all Sylow -subgroups by conjugation. Write .
Step 1: . A Sylow -subgroup is a fixed point of the -action Iff . But then And Which is a power of . Since is the maximal power of dividing and We get Hence (since ).
Thus is the unique fixed point. All other orbits have size A power of greater than . By the fixed-point congruence for -group actions: . Step 2: divides . The group acts transitively on by conjugation (by Sylow’s second theorem). Hence . Since , is divisible by . Therefore divides .
7.6 Worked Examples: Finding Sylow Subgroups
Section titled “7.6 Worked Examples: Finding Sylow Subgroups”Problem. Find all Sylow -subgroups and Sylow -subgroups of .
Solution
Solution. .
Sylow -subgroups (order ). and divides So . The Sylow -subgroups are generated by -cycles. There are elements of order And each subgroup of order Contains such elements. So .
The four Sylow -subgroups are: , , , .
Sylow -subgroups (order ). and divides So . A Sylow -subgroup is isomorphic to (the dihedral group of order ). Consider . This is the symmetry group of a square with vertices Isomorphic to .
Since and is not normal in (e.g., ), We have .
7.7 Further Applications
Section titled “7.7 Further Applications”Proposition 7.6. Every group of order is cyclic.
Proof. and divides So . and divides So . Both the Sylow -subgroup and the Sylow -subgroup are Normal, And . Hence .
Proposition 7.7. If is a simple group with Then is prime. The smallest non-abelian simple group is of order .
Proof sketch. If is simple and with and Then (since And divides with ). For many orders, Forcing a normal Sylow subgroup and contradicting simplicity.
7.8 Common Mistakes
Section titled “7.8 Common Mistakes”flowchart TD A[7_The Sylow Theorems] --> B[Key Concepts] A --> C[Core Principles] A --> D[Practical Applications] B --> E[Fundamental definitions] C --> F[Design patterns] D --> G[Real-world usage]Intuition
Section titled “Intuition”The Sylow theorems are the crown jewels of finite group theory. They guarantee the existence of subgroups of prime-power order (Sylow -subgroups) and constrain how many there can be. Think of a group’s order as having prime “layers” — the Sylow theorems say each layer contains a subgroup that fills it completely. The counting constraints and are surprisingly powerful: often is forced to be , meaning the Sylow subgroup is unique and therefore normal. This lets you decompose a group as a product of its Sylow subgroups, reducing classification problems to studying groups of prime-power order.
7.8 Common Mistakes
Section titled “7.8 Common Mistakes”Mistake 1: Assuming Sylow -subgroups are unique Sylow’s first theorem guarantees existence but not uniqueness. The number of Sylow -subgroups can be greater than . Only when is the Sylow -subgroup unique and therefore normal. Always compute from the constraints and before concluding uniqueness.
Mistake 2: Assuming a Sylow -subgroup is automatically normal A Sylow -subgroup is normal if and only if it is the unique Sylow -subgroup (). Sylow’s second theorem states that all Sylow -subgroups are conjugate, so if , none of them are normal. For example, in with , the Sylow -subgroups are not normal.
Mistake 3: Misapplying Sylow’s third theorem constraints The conditions and are necessary but not sufficient to determine uniquely. For instance, if , then divides and , giving . Both values satisfy the congruence condition, so further group-theoretic arguments are needed to pin down .
Cross-References
Section titled “Cross-References”- Group Actions — The proofs of Sylow’s theorems rely heavily on group actions, orbits, and fixed-point counting.
- Lagrange’s Theorem — Lagrange’s theorem constrains the possible orders of subgroups, which Sylow’s theorems refine for prime-power orders.
- Classification of Groups of Small Order — Sylow’s theorems are the main tool for determining which groups of a given order can exist.
- Worked Examples — The worked examples apply Sylow counting arguments to classify groups of specific orders.