Skip to content

$L^p$ Spaces | Mathematics - Wyatt's Notes

For 1p<1 \leq p < \infty, define

Lp(μ)={f:XR measurable:Xfpdμ<}L^p(\mu) = \left\{f : X \to \mathbb{R} \text{ measurable} : \int_X |f|^p\, d\mu < \infty\right\}

with the norm fp=(fpdμ)1/p\|f\|_p = \left(\int |f|^p\, d\mu\right)^{1/p}.

For p=p = \infty, define L(μ)={f:XR measurable:ess supf<}L^\infty(\mu) = \{f : X \to \mathbb{R} \text{ measurable} : \text{ess sup}|f| < \infty\} where f=esssupf\|f\|_\infty = \mathrm{ess\,sup}|f|.

Remark. Elements of LpL^p are equivalence classes of functions equal a.e. The norm p\|\cdot\|_p is well-defined on equivalence classes.

Theorem 7.1 (Holder’s Inequality). Let 1p,q1 \leq p, q \leq \infty with 1/p+1/q=11/p + 1/q = 1. If fLp(μ)f \in L^p(\mu) and gLq(μ)g \in L^q(\mu), then fgL1(μ)fg \in L^1(\mu) and

fg1fpgq\|fg\|_1 \leq \|f\|_p \cdot \|g\|_q

Proof sketch. Use Young’s inequality: abap/p+bq/qab \leq a^p/p + b^q/q for a,b0a, b \geq 0. Set a=f/fpa = |f|/\|f\|_p and b=g/gqb = |g|/\|g\|_q and integrate. \blacksquare

Special case (p=q=2p = q = 2): This reduces to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality: fg1f2g2\|fg\|_1 \leq \|f\|_2 \|g\|_2.

Theorem 7.2 (Minkowski’s Inequality). For 1p1 \leq p \leq \infty and f,gLp(μ)f, g \in L^p(\mu):

f+gpfp+gp\|f + g\|_p \leq \|f\|_p + \|g\|_p

Proof sketch (for 1<p<1 < p < \infty). Write f+gp=f+gf+gp1|f + g|^p = |f + g| \cdot |f + g|^{p-1}. Apply Holder’s inequality with conjugate exponents pp and q=p/(p1)q = p/(p-1):

f+gpfpf+gpp/q+gpf+gpp/q\int |f + g|^p \leq \|f\|_p \|f + g\|_p^{p/q} + \|g\|_p \|f + g\|_p^{p/q}

Divide both sides by f+gpp/q\|f + g\|_p^{p/q}. \blacksquare

Theorem 7.3. (Lp(μ),p)(L^p(\mu), \|\cdot\|_p) is a Banach space for every 1p1 \leq p \leq \infty.

Proof sketch. Let {fn}\{f_n\} be a Cauchy sequence in LpL^p. Extract a subsequence fnkf_{n_k} with fnk+1fnkp<2k\|f_{n_{k+1}} - f_{n_k}\|_p < 2^{-k}. Define g=fn1+k=1fnk+1fnkg = |f_{n_1}| + \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} |f_{n_{k+1}} - f_{n_k}|. By the triangle inequality, gpfn1p+1\|g\|_p \leq \|f_{n_1}\|_p + 1. So gLpg \in L^p, hence g<g < \infty a.e., meaning fnkf_{n_k} converges a.e. to some ff. Show fLpf \in L^p and fnff_n \to f in LpL^p-norm. \blacksquare

Theorem 7.4. L2(μ)L^2(\mu) is a Hilbert space with inner product f,g=fgdμ\langle f, g \rangle = \int f\overline{g}\, d\mu.

Proposition 7.5. If μ\mu is a finite measure and 1p<q1 \leq p < q \leq \infty, then Lq(μ)Lp(μ)L^q(\mu) \subseteq L^p(\mu). In particular, L(μ)L2(μ)L1(μ)L^\infty(\mu) \subseteq L^2(\mu) \subseteq L^1(\mu).

Proof. Apply Holder’s inequality with q/pq/p and its conjugate. \blacksquare

Theorem 7.6 (Riesz Representation for LpL^p). For 1<p<1 < p < \infty, the dual space (Lp)(L^p)^* is isometrically isomorphic to LqL^q, where 1/p+1/q=11/p + 1/q = 1. The pairing is:

f,g=fgdμ,fLp,gLq\langle f, g \rangle = \int f g\, d\mu, \quad f \in L^p, g \in L^q

This also holds for p=1p = 1 provided μ\mu is σ\sigma-finite (the dual of L1L^1 is LL^\infty). For p=p = \infty, the dual is strictly larger than L1L^1 (except for finite-dimensional spaces).

Proposition 7.7. For 1<p<1 < p < \infty, LpL^p spaces are uniformly convex: for any ε>0\varepsilon > 0, there exists δ>0\delta > 0 such that if fp=gp=1\|f\|_p = \|g\|_p = 1 and fgpε\|f - g\|_p \geq \varepsilon, then (f+g)/2p1δ\|(f + g)/2\|_p \leq 1 - \delta.

Uniform convexity implies reflexivity for 1<p<1 < p < \infty and guarantees the existence and uniqueness of best approximations in closed convex subspaces.

Proposition 7.8 (Density of Simple Functions). Simple functions are dense in Lp(μ)L^p(\mu) for 1p<1 \leq p < \infty. For the Lebesgue measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, the following are also dense:

  1. Step functions (finite linear combinations of characteristic functions of rectangles)
  2. Continuous functions with compact support Cc(Rn)C_c(\mathbb{R}^n)
  3. Smooth functions with compact support Cc(Rn)C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)

Proposition 7.9. If fnff_n \to f in LpL^p, then there exists a subsequence fnkf_{n_k} that converges pointwise a.e. to ff. The converse is false: pointwise convergence a.e. does not imply LpL^p convergence (counterexample: fn=nχ[0,1/n]f_n = n\chi_{[0, 1/n]} on [0,1][0, 1] converges pointwise to 00 but fn1=1\|f_n\|_1 = 1 for all nn).

Theorem 7.10 (Dominated Convergence in LpL^p). If fnff_n \to f a.e. and there exists gLpg \in L^p such that fng|f_n| \leq g a.e. for all nn, then fnff_n \to f in LpL^p.

7.10 Worked Example: LpL^p Norm Behaviour

Section titled “7.10 Worked Example: LpL^pLp Norm Behaviour”

Problem. Let f(x)=x1/2f(x) = x^{-1/2} on (0,1)(0, 1) with Lebesgue measure. For which pp does fLp(0,1)f \in L^p(0, 1)?

Solution

Compute 01f(x)pdx=01xp/2dx\int_0^1 |f(x)|^p dx = \int_0^1 x^{-p/2} dx. This integral converges iff p/2>1-p/2 > -1, i.e., p<2p < 2. So fLp(0,1)f \in L^p(0, 1) precisely for 1p<21 \leq p < 2. Note fL2(0,1)f \notin L^2(0, 1) (the integral diverges logarithmically at the boundary).

\blacksquare

Problem. Show that if fLpLqf \in L^p \cap L^q with 1p<q1 \leq p < q \leq \infty, then fLrf \in L^r for all r[p,q]r \in [p, q].

Solution

Write r=θp+(1θ)qr = \theta p + (1-\theta)q with θ[0,1]\theta \in [0, 1], so 1=θp/r+(1θ)q/r1 = \theta p/r + (1-\theta)q/r. Apply Holder’s inequality with exponents r/(θp)r/(\theta p) and r/((1θ)q)r/((1-\theta)q):

fr=fθpf(1θ)q(fp)θr/p(fq)(1θ)r/q\int |f|^r = \int |f|^{\theta p} |f|^{(1-\theta)q} \leq \left(\int |f|^p\right)^{\theta r/p} \left(\int |f|^q\right)^{(1-\theta) r/q}

Therefore frfpθfq1θ\|f\|_r \leq \|f\|_p^\theta \|f\|_q^{1-\theta}, establishing both that fLrf \in L^r and a quantitative interpolation inequality.

\blacksquare

Mistake 1: Confusing LpL^p spaces with p\ell^p spaces Lp(μ)L^p(\mu) consists of measurable functions with finite pp-norm, while p\ell^p consists of sequences with finite pp-norm. They are different spaces: LpL^p is a function space and p\ell^p is a sequence space. For counting measure on N\mathbb{N}, Lp(N)L^p(\mathbb{N}) coincides with p\ell^p, but this is a special case.

Mistake 2: Assuming LpL^p convergence implies pointwise convergence LpL^p convergence does not imply pointwise convergence everywhere. A sequence can converge in LpL^p-norm while diverging on a set of measure zero. Conversely, pointwise convergence a.e. does not imply LpL^p convergence (counterexample: fn=nχ[0,1/n]f_n = n\chi_{[0,1/n]}). Use the dominated convergence theorem to bridge the two.

Mistake 3: Assuming completeness implies reflexivity LpL^p spaces are complete (Banach spaces) for all 1p1 \leq p \leq \infty, but they are reflexive only for 1<p<1 < p < \infty. The spaces L1L^1 and LL^\infty are not reflexive. Reflexivity requires the natural embedding into the bidual to be surjective, which fails for p=1p = 1 and p=p = \infty.

Definition. The weak LpL^p space Lp,(μ)L^{p,\infty}(\mu) consists of measurable functions for which

[f]p,=supt>0tμ({x:f(x)>t})1/p<[f]_{p,\infty} = \sup_{t > 0} t\, \mu(\{x : |f(x)| > t\})^{1/p} < \infty

Weak LpL^p spaces are larger than LpL^p: LpLp,L^p \subseteq L^{p,\infty} with fp,fp\|f\|_{p,\infty} \leq \|f\|_p.

Example. The function f(x)=1/x1/pf(x) = 1/|x|^{1/p} on R\mathbb{R} is in Lp,L^{p,\infty} but not in LpL^p (the singularity is just barely non-integrable in the LpL^p sense).

Lorentz spaces Lp,q(μ)L^{p,q}(\mu) refine the LpL^p scale, with Lp,p=LpL^{p,p} = L^p and Lp,L^{p,\infty} being weak LpL^p. They are important in interpolation theory and harmonic analysis.

7.13 Worked Example: LpL^p on a Finite Measure Space

Section titled “7.13 Worked Example: LpL^pLp on a Finite Measure Space”
flowchart TD
A[7_L P Spaces] --> B[Key Concepts]
A --> C[Core Principles]
A --> D[Practical Applications]
B --> E[Fundamental definitions]
C --> F[Design patterns]
D --> G[Real-world usage]

LpL^p spaces formalise the idea of “how big” a function is by integrating its pp-th power. The L2L^2 space is the familiar Hilbert space of square-integrable functions — the setting for Fourier analysis and quantum mechanics. For p2p \neq 2, there is no inner product, only the norm. The key trade-off: larger pp penalises peaks more harshly, so LL^\infty measures the essential supremum (the worst-case value). Minkowski’s inequality is the triangle inequality for these spaces, and Hölder’s inequality controls how products of functions behave. The Riesz-Fischer theorem — LpL^p is complete — is what makes integration theory work: Cauchy sequences of functions actually converge to a function.

7.13 Worked Example: LpL^p on a Finite Measure Space

Section titled “7.13 Worked Example: LpL^pLp on a Finite Measure Space”

Problem. Show that if μ(X)<\mu(X) < \infty, then limpfp=f\lim_{p \to \infty} \|f\|_p = \|f\|_\infty for fL(μ)f \in L^\infty(\mu).

Solution

Let M=fM = \|f\|_\infty. For any ε>0\varepsilon > 0, the set A={x:f(x)>Mε}A = \{x : |f(x)| > M - \varepsilon\} has μ(A)>0\mu(A) > 0. Then:

fp(A(Mε)pdμ)1/p=(Mε)μ(A)1/p\|f\|_p \geq \left(\int_A (M - \varepsilon)^p d\mu\right)^{1/p} = (M - \varepsilon)\,\mu(A)^{1/p}

As pp \to \infty, μ(A)1/p1\mu(A)^{1/p} \to 1, so lim infpfpMε\liminf_{p\to\infty} \|f\|_p \geq M - \varepsilon. Since ε\varepsilon is arbitrary, lim inffpM\liminf \|f\|_p \geq M.

Conversely, fpMμ(X)1/p\|f\|_p \leq M\,\mu(X)^{1/p}, so lim suppfpM\limsup_{p\to\infty} \|f\|_p \leq M. Therefore limpfp=M=f\lim_{p\to\infty} \|f\|_p = M = \|f\|_\infty.

\blacksquare

This section provides detailed coverage of advanced concepts, including full derivations, proofs, and extended examples.

Complete mathematical derivations and proofs are provided where appropriate. Each step is explained to ensure understanding of the underlying reasoning.

Advanced examples demonstrate the application of concepts to complex problems. These examples go beyond standard exam questions to develop deeper understanding.

This material connects to current research and advanced applications in the field. Understanding these connections provides context for the study material.

Ensure you have mastered the prerequisite material before attempting this advanced content.