Bounded Linear Operators
3.1 Definitions
Section titled “3.1 Definitions”A linear operator between normed spaces is bounded if there exists such that for all . The operator norm is
Proposition 3.1. A linear operator is bounded if and only if it is continuous.
Proposition 3.2. is bounded if and only if it maps bounded sets to bounded sets.
The space of all bounded linear operators from to is a Banach space when is complete, with the operator norm.
3.2 Examples
Section titled “3.2 Examples”Example 1. The identity operator has .
Example 2. The zero operator has .
Example 3. Let be defined by (right shift). Then .
Example 4. The multiplication operator on is bounded with .
3.3 Dual Spaces
Section titled “3.3 Dual Spaces”The dual space of is (or ), the space of all bounded linear functionals.
Theorem 3.3. is always a Banach space.
Theorem 3.4. via for .
Theorem 3.5. for where .
Theorem 3.6. where .
3.4 Annihilators and the Double Dual
Section titled “3.4 Annihilators and the Double Dual”Let be a subspace of a normed space . The annihilator of is
Let be a subspace of . The pre-annihilator of is
Proposition 3.7. If is a subspace, then is a closed subspace of . If is a subspace, then is a closed subspace of .
Proofs
Section titled “Proofs”The page states fifteen results; the proofs below are the ones that carry the subject, chosen because their arguments; linearity converts boundedness to continuity at a point, completeness passes to operator spaces, Hölder identifies duals; are the ones every later page reuses.
Proposition 3.1 (bounded iff continuous). A linear operator between normed spaces is bounded iff it is continuous.
Proof. () If then , and – continuity follows with .
() Continuity at gives with . Every nonzero can be scaled to , which has norm , so ; bounded with . Linearity enters in the scaling step: without it, continuity at a point says nothing about other points.
Theorem 3.3 ( is Banach). If is complete, then with the operator norm is a Banach space.
Proof. is a vector space, and the operator norm is a norm: homogeneity and the triangle inequality come from the norm on , and for all .
For completeness, let be Cauchy in operator norm. Then for each , shows is Cauchy in , which is complete, so for some . Define by ; linearity passes to the limit. The Cauchy condition gives, for each an with for ; letting in ; legitimate because ‘s norm is continuous; gives for all and . So with norm at most : is bounded and in operator norm.
The proof is the completeness transfer pattern; pointwise Cauchy, identify the limit, then upgrade the convergence using the operator-norm structure; and it is the same argument that makes the space of bounded bilinear forms, and every variant, complete. Note that completeness of is essential: inherits Cauchy limits pointwise, and without ‘s completeness the pointwise limits need not exist.
Theorem 3.5 (). For with , every is for a unique , and the map is an isometric isomorphism.
Proof. Let be the standard basis. Set . For define the truncations ; by linearity .
Bound on the tail coefficients. For fixed , consider the vector with the phase chosen so , supported at and scaled to make . Then
when ; for the same computation with the sup norm gives . So ; for , apply the same construction to the truncations: for scaled by ,
uniformly in , so with .
Representation and isometry. Hölder’s inequality says the map , , is bounded with , and equality is attained by the phase-aligned sequence; so . The truncations in (dominated convergence, since ), and is continuous, so
which is the representation, with isometry from . Uniqueness: determines .
The two estimates worth internalising: the phase-aligned truncation that bounds -norms of the coefficients uniformly in ; choosing signs to make each term contribute maximally is the standard move; and Hölder’s inequality providing both the boundedness and the isometry. The companion results, that and , follow the same proof with the approximating family changed: finitely supported sequences for , simple functions for . What has no such proof is and : their duals are the ba spaces, strictly larger than ; a non-separability fact that marks the boundary of this theorem.
Proofs of the annihilator results
Section titled “Proofs of the annihilator results”Proposition 3.7 (annihilators are closed) and the double-annihilator identity .
Proof of closedness. For , the map is continuous on , and is the intersection of its kernels; an intersection of closed sets is closed. The pre-annihilator is the same argument with roles swapped.
Proof of for a subspace of a normed space . : if , take with ; for , continuity gives , so .
For the converse, suppose but . Since is closed and is at positive distance from it, the geometric form of Hahn–Banach separates: there is and with for all . Scaling by a constant and using that is a subspace; so -style scaling keeps at whatever value it has; gives , i.e. . But then by , contradicting for the chosen positive.
This identity is why quotient-space duality works: , and combined with it says the dual of the quotient is exactly the functionals vanishing on ; the bridge between the quotient-space constructions of the abstract algebra track and the normed-space theory here.
Proposition 3.8. For a subspace , (the closure of ).
Proposition 3.9. For finite-dimensional subspaces , .
The double dual (or bidual) of is . There is a natural embedding defined by for . The Hahn-Banach theorem guarantees that is an isometric embedding: .
Definition. A normed space is reflexive if the canonical embedding is surjective, i.e., .
Proposition 3.10. Every reflexive space is a Banach space.
Example. is reflexive for since .
Example. is reflexive for .
Example. , , and are not reflexive. In particular, , and .
Theorem 3.11. A Banach space is reflexive if and only if its closed unit ball is weakly compact.
Theorem 3.12. If is reflexive, then every bounded sequence has a weakly convergent subsequence (Eberlein-Smulian theorem). In particular, every continuous linear functional achieves its norm on the closed unit ball.
Worked Example. Show that is not reflexive. Since by Theorem 3.6, and by Theorem 3.4, we have . The canonical embedding is the inclusion map. Since contains bounded sequences that do not converge to zero (e.g., the constant sequence ), is not surjective, so is not reflexive.
3.5 Key Relationships
Section titled “3.5 Key Relationships”- Boundedness and continuity are equivalent for linear operators between normed spaces.
- The operator norm is submultiplicative: for composable operators.
- Reflexivity implies the Banach space property but not conversely.
- The double dual is always reflexive when is a Banach space.
3.6 Common Pitfalls
Section titled “3.6 Common Pitfalls”- Assuming that every bounded linear functional on a subspace extends to the whole space without invoking the Hahn-Banach theorem. Extension requires the Hahn-Banach theorem and is not automatic.
- Confusing weak convergence with strong convergence. A sequence can converge weakly but not strongly (e.g., the standard basis in ).
- Forgetting that is a Banach space only when is complete. If is not complete, the space of bounded operators need not be.
- Assuming reflexivity when only the canonical embedding is injective. Injectivity holds for all normed spaces by Hahn-Banach; reflexivity requires surjectivity.
3.7 Applications
Section titled “3.7 Applications”- Quantum mechanics: Observables are modelled as self-adjoint bounded operators on Hilbert spaces.
- Numerical analysis: The spectral radius of an iteration matrix determines convergence of iterative methods.
- Partial differential equations: Bounded operators on Sobolev spaces encode weak formulations of PDEs.
- Signal processing: Bounded linear operators on spaces represent filters and transforms.
3.8 The Open Mapping Theorem
Section titled “3.8 The Open Mapping Theorem”Theorem 3.13 (Open Mapping Theorem). If and are Banach spaces and is a surjective bounded linear operator, then is an open map (it maps open sets to open sets).
Corollary 3.14 (Bounded Inverse Theorem). If is a bijective bounded linear operator between Banach spaces, then is also bounded.
Theorem 3.15 (Closed Graph Theorem). A linear operator between Banach spaces is bounded if and only if its graph is closed in .
3.9 Worked Example: Unbounded Operator
Section titled “3.9 Worked Example: Unbounded Operator”Cross-References
Section titled “Cross-References”Normed Spaces and Banach Spaces: Defines the domain and codomain spaces for bounded linear operators and establishes the dual space framework.
The Fundamental Theorems: Presents the Hahn-Banach, open mapping, and closed graph theorems that govern the behaviour of bounded operators between Banach spaces.
Compact Operators: Studies a subclass of bounded operators with finite-dimensional-like properties, crucial for spectral theory.
Intuition
Section titled “Intuition”Bounded linear operators are the continuous linear maps between normed spaces, they do not blow up small inputs into large outputs. The operator norm measures the maximum stretching factor. The open mapping theorem says that surjective bounded operators between Banach spaces are automatically open maps, which implies the bounded inverse theorem: an invertible bounded operator has a bounded inverse. The closed graph theorem provides a practical test: a linear operator is bounded if and only if its graph is closed. These three results, open mapping, bounded inverse, and closed graph, are the fundamental theorems of functional analysis, guaranteeing that well-behaved operators behave as expected.
3.9 Worked Example: Unbounded Operator
Section titled “3.9 Worked Example: Unbounded Operator”Problem. Let be defined by . Show that is unbounded.
Solution
Consider the sequence . Then for all .
, so .
Since as , the operator is unbounded.