Geodesics
6.1 Definition
Section titled “6.1 Definition”A geodesic is a curve whose acceleration is zero: .
In local coordinates, the geodesic equation is:
This is a second-order ODE with smooth coefficients, so by the existence and uniqueness theorem for ODEs, geodesics exist and are unique given an initial point and velocity.
Proposition 6.1. Geodesics are locally distance-minimizing: for sufficiently small , the geodesic from to has length equal to the Riemannian distance .
This is proved at the end of §6.8, as the corollary of the Gauss lemma.
6.2 The Exponential Map
Section titled “6.2 The Exponential Map”For , the exponential map is defined by , where is the geodesic with and .
Proposition 6.2. The exponential map is a local diffeomorphism near the origin: there exists such that is a diffeomorphism from onto an open neighborhood of .
Proof. Compute the differential at the origin: for , , by the very definition of . So , a linear isomorphism. The inverse function theorem gives the result.
6.3 Completeness
Section titled “6.3 Completeness”A Riemannian manifold is geodesically complete if every maximal geodesic is defined for all time (i.e., on ).
Theorem 6.3 (Hopf-Rinow). For a connected Riemannian manifold, the following are equivalent:
- is geodesically complete.
- is a complete metric space (where is the Riemannian distance).
- Every closed and bounded subset of is compact.
- There exists such that is defined on all of .
Proof. . In a metric space where some closed ball around each point is compact, the space is complete: a Cauchy sequence eventually lies in one closed ball, which is sequentially compact, so the sequence has a convergent subsequence; and a Cauchy sequence with a convergent subsequence converges.
. Let be a maximal geodesic and suppose . For , (unit-speed after reparametrisation), so has diameter at most : it is bounded, and its closure is closed and bounded; compact by (3). So has a convergent subsequence as , say to . Local existence of geodesics at with the limiting velocity (the ODE continuation criterion: extends past iff has a limit in , which compactness supplies) extends past , contradicting maximality. So .
. Trivial: geodesic completeness says exactly that the geodesic used to define exists for all unit times, for every .
. This is the heart. Two lemmas.
Lemma A (minimising geodesics from ). If is defined on the closed ball , then every with is joined to by a minimising geodesic.
Proof of Lemma A. Let and consider the set . Then (trivially) and is closed: if with minimising geodesics to points at distance , the initial velocities have and lie in the finite-dimensional compact sphere of ; a subsequence converges, , and is a minimising geodesic to a point at distance ; the continuity of the distance and of (defined on ) close the argument. And is open in : if is joined to by a minimising geodesic with , extend past (possible since ) and use the break-point observation: for just past on the extension, by the triangle inequality, while a curve from to nearly achieving must pass near ; the limit as the curve’s passage point approaches gives , so equality holds and the extended geodesic is minimising to ; putting a neighbourhood of in . Since is connected, ; in particular , and a minimising geodesic from to exists.
Lemma B (surjectivity with control). Under (4), every is joined to by a minimising geodesic, and writing with .
Proof of Lemma B. Immediate from Lemma A: is defined on every closed ball, so Lemma A applies at every radius , and a minimising geodesic from to has the form with its length .
Now let be closed and bounded. Boundedness puts for some (using the fixed base point of (4) and connectedness of , so is finite everywhere). Every can be written with by Lemma B. The ball is compact ( is finite-dimensional, Heine—Borel), so a sequence in has initial vectors with a convergent subsequence; continuity of then makes converge to a point of ( is closed). So is sequentially compact, hence compact.
Corollary. Every compact Riemannian manifold is geodesically complete.
Proof. A compact metric space has all closed subsets compact, and all subsets are bounded - property (3) holds, so (1) follows.
6.4 Jacobi Fields
Section titled “6.4 Jacobi Fields”A Jacobi field along a geodesic is a vector field that satisfies the Jacobi equation:
Jacobi fields describe the variation of nearby geodesics. They measure how geodesics spread apart or come together under the influence of curvature.
Proposition 6.4. A vector field along is a Jacobi field if and only if it arises as the variation field of a one-parameter family of geodesics with and .
Proof. () Let be a family of geodesics and the variation field. Since each is a geodesic, for all . Differentiate in and use the torsion-free commutation formula :
using the antisymmetry in the final two slots. So satisfies the Jacobi equation.
() Conversely, let satisfy the Jacobi equation; we construct a variation with field . Let and . Take a curve with , (e.g. ), and let be the -valued field obtained by parallel transporting along . Define
which is a geodesic for each small (local existence). Then . Its variation field is a Jacobi field by (), with initial data (as ), and
since and was built to have covariant derivative along . The Jacobi equation is linear second-order with smooth coefficients, so its solution space is a -dimensional vector space and the initial-value problem has a unique solution: .
6.5 Conjugate Points
Section titled “6.5 Conjugate Points”Two points are conjugate along a geodesic if there exists a non-zero Jacobi field along vanishing at both and .
Theorem 6.5. A geodesic ceases to be length-minimizing past its first conjugate point.
Proof sketch (index-form argument). Assume is unit-speed, fix endpoints , , and consider the index form on vector fields along vanishing at both endpoints:
Two facts drive the proof. First, is the second variation of energy: for variations through curves with fixed endpoints, ; this is the second variation formula of §6.11 with the boundary terms vanishing.
Second, a Jacobi field vanishing at both endpoints has : integrate by parts,
where the bracket vanishes (endpoint vanishing) and the integrand vanishes by the Jacobi equation.
Now suppose is conjugate to along at parameter , with Jacobi field vanishing at and . The theory of the index form (Morse index lemma; the finite-dimensional reduction along a basis of Jacobi fields) shows: for all on the subinterval , with degenerate exactly on the Jacobi fields; but on the full interval one can construct a field vanishing at both ends with ; take equal to on scaled against a second field supported on , and use the matching condition at plus the degeneracy there to make the cross terms absorb the boundary contribution. A negative second variation means ; hence, for curves of nearly constant speed, ; decreases along the corresponding variation through curves from to . So near there are curves from to strictly shorter than : is not locally minimising past its first conjugate point.
The full construction of the shorter curve (cut-off functions and the explicit cross-term estimate) is carried out in do Carmo, Riemannian Geometry, Chapter 9; the computation above supplies the two facts that make it work.
6.6 Geodesic Deviation
Section titled “6.6 Geodesic Deviation”The geodesic deviation equation describes the relative acceleration of nearby geodesics:
In general relativity, this is the equation of geodesic deviation that governs tidal forces. For a congruence of timelike geodesics in the standard model of cosmology, it gives the relative acceleration of nearby test particles.
Example. On , geodesics are great circles. Jacobi fields along the equator show that all geodesics starting at the north pole reconverge at the south pole (the antipodal point is conjugate).
6.7 Normal Coordinates
Section titled “6.7 Normal Coordinates”Riemannian normal coordinates at are given by the inverse of the exponential map: . In these coordinates:
- The metric at is Euclidean: .
- The Christoffel symbols vanish at : .
- Geodesics through are straight lines through the origin.
6.8 The Gauss Lemma and Minimality
Section titled “6.8 The Gauss Lemma and Minimality”Lemma 6.6 (Gauss Lemma). For , is a radial isometry: for any :
Proof. Consider the two-parameter family
whose -curves are geodesics starting at with initial velocities . Write and (so and , and since for all ).
Each -curve is a geodesic, so is independent of ; in particular (the speed equals the norm of the initial vector). Differentiate the inner product in :
where by torsion-freeness. Integrating in from ; where ; gives . Evaluating at , :
Corollary. Geodesics are locally length-minimizing: for sufficiently small, is the unique shortest curve from to .
Proof. Shrink the ball so that is a diffeomorphism on (Proposition 6.2) and let be any piecewise smooth curve from to staying inside that ball. In the normal coordinates , write with and . By the Gauss lemma applied at (radial direction ), is orthogonal to the angular directions, so
Hence , with equality in the triangle inequality forcing radial throughout; i.e. is the radial geodesic up to reparametrisation. This proves Proposition 6.1.
6.9 Practice Problems
Section titled “6.9 Practice Problems”Problem 1. Find the geodesics of the Poincaré half-plane with metric .
Solution. The geodesic equations give circles centered on the -axis and vertical lines. These are the paths of minimal length in hyperbolic geometry.
Problem 2. Show that geodesics on are great circles.
Problem 3. Compute the Jacobi fields along a geodesic in with the Euclidean metric. Explain the result in terms of geodesic spread.
Problem 4. Prove that if is complete and has non-positive sectional curvature, then the exponential map is a covering map for every (Cartan-Hadamard theorem).
Problem 5. Show that on a compact Riemannian manifold, every geodesic is defined for all time.
6.10 The Length Functional and Energy Functional
Section titled “6.10 The Length Functional and Energy Functional”Geodesics can also be characterized as critical points of the energy functional:
The Euler-Lagrange equations for give the geodesic equation. Indeed, with :
Raising the index with and symmetrising the coefficient of in gives exactly . The length functional has the same unparametrised critical points but is parametrisation-independent; the energy fixes the parametrisation, which is why its Euler-Lagrange equations are exactly the geodesic equation.
6.11 The First and Second Variation of Energy
Section titled “6.11 The First and Second Variation of Energy”First variation formula:
where is the variation field and is the jump discontinuity at break points.
Second variation formula:
The second variation is used to study stability of geodesics and to prove that conjugate points indicate loss of minimizing property.
6.12 The Morse Index Theorem
Section titled “6.12 The Morse Index Theorem”Theorem 6.7 (Morse Index Theorem). The index of a geodesic segment : the dimension of the largest subspace of endpoint-vanishing variation fields on which the index form is negative definite; equals the number of conjugate points to along in , counted with multiplicity (each conjugate point contributing as many directions as there are independent Jacobi fields vanishing there).
This theorem connects the calculus of variations to the topology of the loop space of a manifold.
Proof sketch. The index form is a symmetric bilinear form on the infinite-dimensional space of endpoint-vanishing fields. Expand each such field in a basis of Jacobi fields along (via the data ): for with smooth scalar vanishing at both endpoints, two integrations by parts reduce the index form to
for constants determined by the curvature; a quadratic form in the finitely many functions . The spectral theory of this Sturm—Liouville-type operator then gives: loses one negative direction each time passes a conjugate point, and the count of directions lost at each point is exactly the multiplicity of the Jacobi-field degeneracy there. The count of negative directions at is therefore the number of conjugate points with multiplicity. The full spectral argument is in Milnor, Morse Theory, Part III.
6.13 Common Mistakes
Section titled “6.13 Common Mistakes”Mistake 1: Assuming geodesics are always the shortest path Geodesics are locally length-minimizing, but globally they may not be the shortest curve between two points. On a sphere, great circle arcs longer than are geodesics but not shortest paths. The cut locus marks where geodesics cease to be minimizing.
Mistake 2: Confusing the exponential map with a global diffeomorphism The exponential map is only a local diffeomorphism near the origin. Beyond the injectivity radius, it may fail to be one-to-one. Students often assume gives a global coordinate system, which is only true for spaces like Euclidean space or hyperbolic space.
Mistake 3: Forgetting that the geodesic equation is second-order The equation requires both an initial point and an initial velocity to determine a unique geodesic. Specifying only the starting point leaves infinitely many geodesics. Students sometimes treat geodesics like integral curves of vector fields, which are first-order and need only an initial point.
6.14 Geodesic Triangles under Constant Curvature
Section titled “6.14 Geodesic Triangles under Constant Curvature”On a surface of constant curvature , the area of a geodesic triangle with interior angles is:
- On (): sum of angles , area .
- On (): sum of angles , area .
- On (): sum of angles , area arbitrary.
6.15 Additional Practice Problems
Section titled “6.15 Additional Practice Problems”Problem 6. Show that the exponential map is a radial isometry near the origin (Gauss lemma). Use this to prove that geodesics are locally length-minimizing.
Problem 7. Prove that on a complete Riemannian manifold with non-positive sectional curvature, no two points are conjugate.
Problem 8. Show that the geodesic flow on the unit tangent bundle of a compact Riemannian manifold is a Hamiltonian flow with respect to the natural symplectic structure.
Intuition
Section titled “Intuition”Geodesics are the straightest possible paths on a curved surface. On a flat plane, they are straight lines; on a sphere, they are great circles. The key insight is that a geodesic has zero acceleration as measured along the surface, it does not turn left or right relative to the surface geometry. The exponential map sends a tangent vector to the point you reach by following the geodesic in that direction for unit time, providing local coordinates that straighten out the geometry near a point. On negatively curved surfaces, geodesics diverge rapidly, while on positively curved surfaces they converge, this is why parallel geodesics on a sphere eventually meet.
Cross-References
Section titled “Cross-References”Vector Fields and Flows — Geodesics are integral curves of the geodesic spray vector field on the tangent bundle, linking flow theory to metric geometry.
Differential Geometry Summary — The summary table of Christoffel symbols and curvature tensors provides the computational tools used throughout this chapter.
Electromagnetic Waves — The wave equation in curved spacetime uses geodesic deviation to describe tidal forces in general relativity.
Special Relativity and Electromagnetism — Minkowski spacetime is a flat Lorentzian manifold whose geodesics are the worldlines of free particles.