Skip to content

A geodesic is a curve γ(t)\gamma(t) whose acceleration is zero: ∇γ˙γ˙=0\nabla_{\dot{\gamma}} \dot{\gamma} = 0.

In local coordinates, the geodesic equation is:

γ¨k+Γijk γ˙iγ˙j=0\ddot{\gamma}^k + \Gamma^k_{ij}\, \dot{\gamma}^i \dot{\gamma}^j = 0

This is a second-order ODE with smooth coefficients, so by the existence and uniqueness theorem for ODEs, geodesics exist and are unique given an initial point and velocity.

Proposition 6.1. Geodesics are locally distance-minimizing: for sufficiently small tt, the geodesic γ\gamma from pp to γ(t)\gamma(t) has length equal to the Riemannian distance d(p,γ(t))d(p, \gamma(t)).

This is proved at the end of §6.8, as the corollary of the Gauss lemma.

For p∈Mp \in M, the exponential map exp⁡p:TpM→M\exp_p : T_p M \to M is defined by exp⁡p(v)=γv(1)\exp_p(v) = \gamma_v(1), where γv\gamma_v is the geodesic with γv(0)=p\gamma_v(0) = p and γ˙v(0)=v\dot{\gamma}_v(0) = v.

Proposition 6.2. The exponential map is a local diffeomorphism near the origin: there exists ε>0\varepsilon > 0 such that exp⁡p\exp_p is a diffeomorphism from {v∈TpM:∥v∥<ε}\{v \in T_p M : \|v\| < \varepsilon\} onto an open neighborhood of pp.

Proof. Compute the differential at the origin: for w∈TpMw \in T_pM, d(exp⁡p)0(w)=dds∣s=0exp⁡p(sw)=dds∣s=0γw(s)=γ˙w(0)=wd(\exp_p)_0(w) = \left.\frac{d}{ds}\right|_{s=0} \exp_p(sw) = \left.\frac{d}{ds}\right|_{s=0} \gamma_w(s) = \dot{\gamma}_w(0) = w, by the very definition of γw\gamma_w. So d(exp⁡p)0=id⁡TpMd(\exp_p)_0 = \operatorname{id}_{T_pM}, a linear isomorphism. The inverse function theorem gives the result. ■\blacksquare

A Riemannian manifold (M,g)(M, g) is geodesically complete if every maximal geodesic is defined for all time (i.e., on R\mathbb{R}).

Theorem 6.3 (Hopf-Rinow). For a connected Riemannian manifold, the following are equivalent:

  1. MM is geodesically complete.
  2. (M,d)(M, d) is a complete metric space (where dd is the Riemannian distance).
  3. Every closed and bounded subset of MM is compact.
  4. There exists p∈Mp \in M such that exp⁡p\exp_p is defined on all of TpMT_p M.

Proof. (3)⇒(2)(3) \Rightarrow (2). In a metric space where some closed ball around each point is compact, the space is complete: a Cauchy sequence eventually lies in one closed ball, which is sequentially compact, so the sequence has a convergent subsequence; and a Cauchy sequence with a convergent subsequence converges.

(3)⇒(1)(3) \Rightarrow (1). Let γ:[0,T)→M\gamma : [0, T) \to M be a maximal geodesic and suppose T<∞T < \infty. For t<Tt < T, ∥γ˙(t)∥=∥γ˙(0)∥\|\dot{\gamma}(t)\| = \|\dot{\gamma}(0)\| (unit-speed after reparametrisation), so γ([0,T))\gamma([0, T)) has diameter at most T∥γ˙(0)∥T\|\dot{\gamma}(0)\|: it is bounded, and its closure is closed and bounded; compact by (3). So γ(t)\gamma(t) has a convergent subsequence as t↑Tt \uparrow T, say to q∈Mq \in M. Local existence of geodesics at qq with the limiting velocity (the ODE continuation criterion: γ\gamma extends past TT iff γ˙(t)\dot{\gamma}(t) has a limit in TqMT_qM, which compactness supplies) extends γ\gamma past TT, contradicting maximality. So T=∞T = \infty.

(1)⇒(4)(1) \Rightarrow (4). Trivial: geodesic completeness says exactly that the geodesic γv\gamma_v used to define exp⁡p(v)=γv(1)\exp_p(v) = \gamma_v(1) exists for all unit times, for every vv.

(4)⇒(3)(4) \Rightarrow (3). This is the heart. Two lemmas.

Lemma A (minimising geodesics from pp). If exp⁡p\exp_p is defined on the closed ball B‾(0,r)⊆TpM\overline{B}(0, r) \subseteq T_pM, then every qq with d(p,q)≤rd(p, q) \leq r is joined to pp by a minimising geodesic.

Proof of Lemma A. Let r′=d(p,q)≤rr' = d(p, q) \leq r and consider the set S={s∈[0,r′]:points at distance s from p are joined to p by minimising geodesics}S = \{s \in [0, r'] : \text{points at distance } s \text{ from } p \text{ are joined to } p \text{ by minimising geodesics}\}. Then 0∈S0 \in S (trivially) and SS is closed: if sj↑ss_j \uparrow s with minimising geodesics γj\gamma_j to points qjq_j at distance sjs_j, the initial velocities vj=γ˙j(0)v_j = \dot{\gamma}_j(0) have ∥vj∥=1\|v_j\| = 1 and lie in the finite-dimensional compact sphere of TpMT_pM; a subsequence converges, vj→vv_j \to v, and exp⁡p(sv)\exp_p(sv) is a minimising geodesic to a point at distance ss; the continuity of the distance and of exp⁡p\exp_p (defined on B‾(0,s)\overline{B}(0, s)) close the argument. And SS is open in [0,r′][0, r']: if qq is joined to pp by a minimising geodesic γ\gamma with d(p,q)=s<rd(p, q) = s < r, extend γ\gamma past qq (possible since s<rs < r) and use the break-point observation: for q′q' just past qq on the extension, d(p,q′)≥d(p,q)+d(q,q′)d(p, q') \geq d(p, q) + d(q, q') by the triangle inequality, while a curve from pp to q′q' nearly achieving d(p,q′)d(p, q') must pass near qq; the limit as the curve’s passage point approaches qq gives d(p,q′)≤d(p,q)+d(q,q′)d(p, q') \leq d(p, q) + d(q, q'), so equality holds and the extended geodesic is minimising to q′q'; putting a neighbourhood of ss in SS. Since [0,r′][0, r'] is connected, S=[0,r′]S = [0, r']; in particular r′=d(p,q)∈Sr' = d(p, q) \in S, and a minimising geodesic from pp to qq exists. □\square

Lemma B (surjectivity with control). Under (4), every q∈Mq \in M is joined to pp by a minimising geodesic, and writing q=exp⁡p(v)q = \exp_p(v) with ∥v∥=d(p,q)\|v\| = d(p, q).

Proof of Lemma B. Immediate from Lemma A: exp⁡p\exp_p is defined on every closed ball, so Lemma A applies at every radius r′=d(p,q)r' = d(p, q), and a minimising geodesic from pp to qq has the form t↦exp⁡p(tv)t \mapsto \exp_p(tv) with ∥v∥=\|v\| = its length =d(p,q)= d(p, q). □\square

Now let C⊆MC \subseteq M be closed and bounded. Boundedness puts C⊆B‾(p,R)C \subseteq \overline{B}(p, R) for some RR (using the fixed base point pp of (4) and connectedness of MM, so d(p,⋅)d(p, \cdot) is finite everywhere). Every x∈Cx \in C can be written x=exp⁡p(vx)x = \exp_p(v_x) with ∥vx∥≤R\|v_x\| \leq R by Lemma B. The ball B‾(0,R)⊆TpM\overline{B}(0, R) \subseteq T_pM is compact (TpMT_pM is finite-dimensional, Heine—Borel), so a sequence in CC has initial vectors vxjv_{x_j} with a convergent subsequence; continuity of exp⁡p\exp_p then makes xjx_j converge to a point of CC (CC is closed). So CC is sequentially compact, hence compact. ■\blacksquare

Corollary. Every compact Riemannian manifold is geodesically complete.

Proof. A compact metric space has all closed subsets compact, and all subsets are bounded - property (3) holds, so (1) follows. ■\blacksquare

A Jacobi field J(t)J(t) along a geodesic γ\gamma is a vector field that satisfies the Jacobi equation:

D2dt2J(t)+R(J(t),γ˙(t))γ˙(t)=0\frac{D^2}{dt^2} J(t) + R(J(t), \dot{\gamma}(t)) \dot{\gamma}(t) = 0

Jacobi fields describe the variation of nearby geodesics. They measure how geodesics spread apart or come together under the influence of curvature.

Proposition 6.4. A vector field JJ along γ\gamma is a Jacobi field if and only if it arises as the variation field of a one-parameter family of geodesics γs(t)\gamma_s(t) with γ0=γ\gamma_0 = \gamma and J(t)=∂sγs(t)∣s=0J(t) = \partial_s \gamma_s(t)|_{s=0}.

Proof. (⇐\Leftarrow) Let γs\gamma_s be a family of geodesics and J=∂sγs∣s=0J = \partial_s \gamma_s|_{s=0} the variation field. Since each γs\gamma_s is a geodesic, Dt∂tγs=0D_t \partial_t \gamma_s = 0 for all ss. Differentiate in ss and use the torsion-free commutation formula DtDsW−DsDtW=R(∂tγ,∂sγ)WD_tD_sW - D_sD_tW = R(\partial_t\gamma, \partial_s\gamma)W:

D2Jdt2=DtDs∂tγ∣s=0=DsDt∂tγ⏟= 0∣s=0+R(γ˙,J)γ˙=−R(J,γ˙)γ˙,\frac{D^2 J}{dt^2} = D_t D_s \partial_t \gamma \big|_{s=0} = D_s \underbrace{D_t \partial_t \gamma}_{=\,0} \Big|_{s=0} + R\bigl(\dot{\gamma}, J\bigr) \dot{\gamma} = -R(J, \dot{\gamma})\dot{\gamma},

using the antisymmetry R(γ˙,J)=−R(J,γ˙)R(\dot{\gamma}, J) = -R(J, \dot{\gamma}) in the final two slots. So JJ satisfies the Jacobi equation.

(⇒\Rightarrow) Conversely, let JJ satisfy the Jacobi equation; we construct a variation with field JJ. Let p=γ(0)p = \gamma(0) and w0=γ˙(0)w_0 = \dot{\gamma}(0). Take a curve c(s)c(s) with c(0)=pc(0) = p, c′(0)=J(0)c'(0) = J(0) (e.g. c(s)=exp⁡p(sJ(0))c(s) = \exp_p(sJ(0))), and let w(s)w(s) be the Tc(s)MT_{c(s)}M-valued field obtained by parallel transporting w0+s DJdt(0)w_0 + s\,\frac{DJ}{dt}(0) along cc. Define

γs(t)=exp⁡c(s)(t w(s)),\gamma_s(t) = \exp_{c(s)}\bigl(t\, w(s)\bigr),

which is a geodesic for each small ss (local existence). Then γ0(t)=exp⁡p(tw0)=γ(t)\gamma_0(t) = \exp_p(tw_0) = \gamma(t). Its variation field K=∂sγs∣s=0K = \partial_s\gamma_s|_{s=0} is a Jacobi field by (⇐\Leftarrow), with initial data K(0)=∂sexp⁡c(s)(0)∣s=0=c′(0)=J(0)K(0) = \partial_s \exp_{c(s)}(0)\big|_{s=0} = c'(0) = J(0) (as exp⁡c(s)(0)=c(s)\exp_{c(s)}(0) = c(s)), and

DKdt(0)=Dt∂sγs(0)=Ds∂tγs(0)∣s=0=Dsw(s)∣s=0=DJdt(0),\frac{DK}{dt}(0) = D_t \partial_s \gamma_s(0) = D_s \partial_t \gamma_s(0)\big|_{s=0} = D_s w(s)\big|_{s=0} = \frac{DJ}{dt}(0),

since ∂tγs(0)=w(s)\partial_t \gamma_s(0) = w(s) and ww was built to have covariant derivative DJdt(0)\frac{DJ}{dt}(0) along cc. The Jacobi equation is linear second-order with smooth coefficients, so its solution space is a 2dim⁡M2\dim M-dimensional vector space and the initial-value problem has a unique solution: K=JK = J. ■\blacksquare

Two points p,q∈Mp, q \in M are conjugate along a geodesic γ\gamma if there exists a non-zero Jacobi field along γ\gamma vanishing at both pp and qq.

Theorem 6.5. A geodesic γ:[0,1]→M\gamma : [0, 1] \to M ceases to be length-minimizing past its first conjugate point.

Proof sketch (index-form argument). Assume γ\gamma is unit-speed, fix endpoints γ(0)=p\gamma(0) = p, γ(1)=q\gamma(1) = q, and consider the index form on vector fields VV along γ\gamma vanishing at both endpoints:

I(V,V)=∫01(∥DVdt∥2−⟨R(V,γ˙)γ˙,V⟩) dt.I(V, V) = \int_0^1 \Bigl( \Bigl\| \frac{DV}{dt} \Bigr\|^2 - \langle R(V, \dot{\gamma})\dot{\gamma}, V \rangle \Bigr)\, dt.

Two facts drive the proof. First, II is the second variation of energy: for variations through curves with fixed endpoints, d2ds2∣s=0E(γs)=I(V,V)\left.\frac{d^2}{ds^2}\right|_{s=0} E(\gamma_s) = I(V, V); this is the second variation formula of §6.11 with the boundary terms vanishing.

Second, a Jacobi field JJ vanishing at both endpoints has I(J,J)=0I(J, J) = 0: integrate by parts,

I(J,J)=[⟨J,DJdt⟩]01−∫01⟨J,D2Jdt2+R(J,γ˙)γ˙⟩ dt=0,I(J, J) = \Bigl[ \langle J, \tfrac{DJ}{dt} \rangle \Bigr]_0^1 - \int_0^1 \Bigl\langle J, \frac{D^2J}{dt^2} + R(J, \dot{\gamma})\dot{\gamma} \Bigr\rangle\, dt = 0,

where the bracket vanishes (endpoint vanishing) and the integrand vanishes by the Jacobi equation.

Now suppose qq is conjugate to pp along γ\gamma at parameter t0<1t_0 < 1, with Jacobi field JJ vanishing at 00 and t0t_0. The theory of the index form (Morse index lemma; the finite-dimensional reduction along a basis of Jacobi fields) shows: I(W,W)≥0I(W, W) \geq 0 for all WW on the subinterval [0,t0][0, t_0], with II degenerate exactly on the Jacobi fields; but on the full interval [0,1][0, 1] one can construct a field WW vanishing at both ends with I(W,W)<0I(W, W) < 0; take WW equal to JJ on [0,t0][0, t_0] scaled against a second field supported on [t0,1][t_0, 1], and use the matching condition at t0t_0 plus the degeneracy there to make the cross terms absorb the boundary contribution. A negative second variation means EE; hence, for curves of nearly constant speed, LL; decreases along the corresponding variation through curves from pp to qq. So near γ\gamma there are curves from pp to qq strictly shorter than γ\gamma: γ\gamma is not locally minimising past its first conjugate point. ■\blacksquare

The full construction of the shorter curve (cut-off functions and the explicit cross-term estimate) is carried out in do Carmo, Riemannian Geometry, Chapter 9; the computation above supplies the two facts that make it work.

The geodesic deviation equation describes the relative acceleration of nearby geodesics:

D2dt2Ji=−R jkliγ˙jJkγ˙l\frac{D^2}{dt^2} J^i = -R^i_{\,jkl} \dot{\gamma}^j J^k \dot{\gamma}^l

In general relativity, this is the equation of geodesic deviation that governs tidal forces. For a congruence of timelike geodesics in the standard model of cosmology, it gives the relative acceleration of nearby test particles.

Example. On S2S^2, geodesics are great circles. Jacobi fields along the equator show that all geodesics starting at the north pole reconverge at the south pole (the antipodal point is conjugate).

Riemannian normal coordinates at pp are given by the inverse of the exponential map: φ=exp⁡p−1:U→TpM≅Rn\varphi = \exp_p^{-1} : U \to T_p M \cong \mathbb{R}^n. In these coordinates:

  • The metric at pp is Euclidean: gij(p)=δijg_{ij}(p) = \delta_{ij}.
  • The Christoffel symbols vanish at pp: Γijk(p)=0\Gamma^k_{ij}(p) = 0.
  • Geodesics through pp are straight lines through the origin.

Lemma 6.6 (Gauss Lemma). For v∈TpMv \in T_p M, exp⁡p\exp_p is a radial isometry: for any w∈Tv(TpM)≅TpMw \in T_v(T_p M) \cong T_p M:

⟨d(exp⁡p)v(v),d(exp⁡p)v(w)⟩=⟨v,w⟩\langle d(\exp_p)_v(v), d(\exp_p)_v(w) \rangle = \langle v, w \rangle

Proof. Consider the two-parameter family

γs(t)=exp⁡p(t(v+sw)),\gamma_s(t) = \exp_p\bigl(t(v + s w)\bigr),

whose tt-curves are geodesics starting at pp with initial velocities v+swv + sw. Write Γ=∂tγs\Gamma = \partial_t \gamma_s and J=∂sγsJ = \partial_s \gamma_s (so J(1)=d(exp⁡p)v(w)J(1) = d(\exp_p)_v(w) and Γ(1)=d(exp⁡p)v(v)\Gamma(1) = d(\exp_p)_v(v), and J(0)=0J(0) = 0 since γs(0)=p\gamma_s(0) = p for all ss).

Each tt-curve is a geodesic, so ∥Γ(t)∥\|\Gamma(t)\| is independent of tt; in particular ⟨Γ,Γ⟩=∥v+sw∥2\langle \Gamma, \Gamma \rangle = \|v + sw\|^2 (the speed equals the norm of the initial vector). Differentiate the inner product ⟨J,Γ⟩\langle J, \Gamma \rangle in tt:

∂∂t⟨J,Γ⟩=⟨DtJ,Γ⟩+⟨J,DtΓ⏟= 0⟩=⟨Ds∂tγs,∂tγs⟩=12∂∂s⟨Γ,Γ⟩=⟨v+sw,w⟩,\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \langle J, \Gamma \rangle = \langle D_t J, \Gamma \rangle + \langle J, \underbrace{D_t \Gamma}_{=\,0} \rangle = \langle D_s \partial_t \gamma_s, \partial_t \gamma_s \rangle = \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial}{\partial s} \langle \Gamma, \Gamma \rangle = \langle v + sw, w \rangle,

where DtJ=Ds∂tγsD_tJ = D_s\partial_t\gamma_s by torsion-freeness. Integrating in tt from 00; where ⟨J,Γ⟩=⟨J(0),Γ(0)⟩=0\langle J, \Gamma \rangle = \langle J(0), \Gamma(0) \rangle = 0; gives ⟨J(t),Γ(t)⟩=t⟨v+sw,w⟩\langle J(t), \Gamma(t) \rangle = t \langle v + sw, w \rangle. Evaluating at t=1t = 1, s=0s = 0:

⟨d(exp⁡p)v(w), d(exp⁡p)v(v)⟩=⟨v,w⟩.■\langle d(\exp_p)_v(w),\, d(\exp_p)_v(v) \rangle = \langle v, w \rangle. \qquad \blacksquare

Corollary. Geodesics are locally length-minimizing: for vv sufficiently small, γ(t)=exp⁡p(tv)\gamma(t) = \exp_p(tv) is the unique shortest curve from pp to exp⁡p(v)\exp_p(v).

Proof. Shrink the ball so that exp⁡p\exp_p is a diffeomorphism on ∥v∥<ε\|v\| < \varepsilon (Proposition 6.2) and let α:[0,1]→M\alpha : [0, 1] \to M be any piecewise smooth curve from pp to exp⁡p(v)\exp_p(v) staying inside that ball. In the normal coordinates x(t)=exp⁡p−1(α(t))x(t) = \exp_p^{-1}(\alpha(t)), write x(t)=ρ(t) x^(t)x(t) = \rho(t)\, \hat{x}(t) with ρ(t)=∥x(t)∥\rho(t) = \|x(t)\| and ∥x^(t)∥=1\|\hat{x}(t)\| = 1. By the Gauss lemma applied at x(t)x(t) (radial direction ∂ρ\partial_\rho), ∂ρ\partial_\rho is orthogonal to the angular directions, so

∥α′(t)∥=∥x′(t)∥≥∣dρdt∣.\|\alpha'(t)\| = \|x'(t)\| \geq \left| \frac{d\rho}{dt} \right|.

Hence L(α)≥∣ρ(1)−ρ(0)∣=∥v∥=L(γ)L(\alpha) \geq |\rho(1) - \rho(0)| = \|v\| = L(\gamma), with equality in the triangle inequality forcing x′(t)x'(t) radial throughout; i.e. α\alpha is the radial geodesic up to reparametrisation. This proves Proposition 6.1. ■\blacksquare

Problem 1. Find the geodesics of the Poincaré half-plane H2\mathbb{H}^2 with metric ds2=(dx2+dy2)/y2ds^2 = (dx^2 + dy^2)/y^2.

Solution. The geodesic equations give circles centered on the xx-axis and vertical lines. These are the paths of minimal length in hyperbolic geometry. ■\blacksquare

Problem 2. Show that geodesics on SnS^n are great circles.

Problem 3. Compute the Jacobi fields along a geodesic in Rn\mathbb{R}^n with the Euclidean metric. Explain the result in terms of geodesic spread.

Problem 4. Prove that if MM is complete and has non-positive sectional curvature, then the exponential map exp⁡p\exp_p is a covering map for every p∈Mp \in M (Cartan-Hadamard theorem).

Problem 5. Show that on a compact Riemannian manifold, every geodesic is defined for all time.

6.10 The Length Functional and Energy Functional

Section titled “6.10 The Length Functional and Energy Functional”

Geodesics can also be characterized as critical points of the energy functional:

E(γ)=12∫ab∥γ˙(t)∥2 dtE(\gamma) = \frac{1}{2} \int_a^b \|\dot{\gamma}(t)\|^2\, dt

The Euler-Lagrange equations for EE give the geodesic equation. Indeed, with L(x,x˙)=12gij(x)x˙ix˙jL(x, \dot{x}) = \tfrac{1}{2} g_{ij}(x)\dot{x}^i\dot{x}^j:

ddt∂L∂x˙k−∂L∂xk=gkjx¨j+∂gkj∂xix˙ix˙j−12∂gij∂xkx˙ix˙j=0.\frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}^k} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial x^k} = g_{kj}\ddot{x}^j + \frac{\partial g_{kj}}{\partial x^i} \dot{x}^i \dot{x}^j - \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial g_{ij}}{\partial x^k} \dot{x}^i \dot{x}^j = 0.

Raising the index with glkg^{lk} and symmetrising the coefficient of x˙ix˙j\dot{x}^i\dot{x}^j in i↔ji \leftrightarrow j gives exactly x¨l+Γijlx˙ix˙j=0\ddot{x}^l + \Gamma^l_{ij}\dot{x}^i\dot{x}^j = 0. The length functional L(γ)=∫ab∥γ˙(t)∥ dtL(\gamma) = \int_a^b \|\dot{\gamma}(t)\|\, dt has the same unparametrised critical points but is parametrisation-independent; the energy fixes the parametrisation, which is why its Euler-Lagrange equations are exactly the geodesic equation.

6.11 The First and Second Variation of Energy

Section titled “6.11 The First and Second Variation of Energy”

First variation formula:

dds∣s=0E(γs)=−∫ab⟨V(t),∇γ˙γ˙⟩ dt−∑i⟨V(ti),Δγ˙(ti)⟩\left.\frac{d}{ds}\right|_{s=0} E(\gamma_s) = -\int_a^b \langle V(t), \nabla_{\dot{\gamma}}\dot{\gamma}\rangle\, dt - \sum_i \langle V(t_i), \Delta\dot{\gamma}(t_i)\rangle

where V(t)V(t) is the variation field and Δγ˙\Delta\dot{\gamma} is the jump discontinuity at break points.

Second variation formula:

d2ds2∣s=0E(γs)=∫ab(∥DVdt∥2−⟨R(V,γ˙)γ˙,V⟩)dt+boundary terms\left.\frac{d^2}{ds^2}\right|_{s=0} E(\gamma_s) = \int_a^b \left(\left\|\frac{DV}{dt}\right\|^2 - \langle R(V, \dot{\gamma})\dot{\gamma}, V\rangle\right) dt + \text{boundary terms}

The second variation is used to study stability of geodesics and to prove that conjugate points indicate loss of minimizing property.

Theorem 6.7 (Morse Index Theorem). The index of a geodesic segment γ:[0,1]→M\gamma : [0, 1] \to M: the dimension of the largest subspace of endpoint-vanishing variation fields on which the index form II is negative definite; equals the number of conjugate points to pp along γ\gamma in (0,1)(0, 1), counted with multiplicity (each conjugate point contributing as many directions as there are independent Jacobi fields vanishing there).

This theorem connects the calculus of variations to the topology of the loop space of a manifold.

Proof sketch. The index form II is a symmetric bilinear form on the infinite-dimensional space of endpoint-vanishing fields. Expand each such field in a basis of Jacobi fields {J1,…,Jn}\{J_1, \dots, J_n\} along γ\gamma (via the data (Ji(0),DJi/dt(0))(J_i(0), DJ_i/dt(0))): for V=∑ifiJiV = \sum_i f_i J_i with smooth scalar fif_i vanishing at both endpoints, two integrations by parts reduce the index form to

I(V,V)=∫01∑i,j(cijfifj−f˙if˙j) dtI(V, V) = \int_0^1 \sum_{i,j} \bigl( c_{ij} f_i f_j - \dot{f}_i \dot{f}_j \bigr)\, dt

for constants cijc_{ij} determined by the curvature; a quadratic form in the finitely many functions fif_i. The spectral theory of this Sturm—Liouville-type operator then gives: II loses one negative direction each time tt passes a conjugate point, and the count of directions lost at each point is exactly the multiplicity of the Jacobi-field degeneracy there. The count of negative directions at t=1t = 1 is therefore the number of conjugate points with multiplicity. The full spectral argument is in Milnor, Morse Theory, Part III. ■\blacksquare

Mistake 1: Assuming geodesics are always the shortest path Geodesics are locally length-minimizing, but globally they may not be the shortest curve between two points. On a sphere, great circle arcs longer than π\pi are geodesics but not shortest paths. The cut locus marks where geodesics cease to be minimizing.

Mistake 2: Confusing the exponential map with a global diffeomorphism The exponential map exp⁡p\exp_p is only a local diffeomorphism near the origin. Beyond the injectivity radius, it may fail to be one-to-one. Students often assume exp⁡p\exp_p gives a global coordinate system, which is only true for spaces like Euclidean space or hyperbolic space.

Mistake 3: Forgetting that the geodesic equation is second-order The equation γ¨k+Γijkγ˙iγ˙j=0\ddot\gamma^k + \Gamma^k_{ij}\dot\gamma^i\dot\gamma^j = 0 requires both an initial point pp and an initial velocity vv to determine a unique geodesic. Specifying only the starting point leaves infinitely many geodesics. Students sometimes treat geodesics like integral curves of vector fields, which are first-order and need only an initial point.

6.14 Geodesic Triangles under Constant Curvature

Section titled “6.14 Geodesic Triangles under Constant Curvature”

On a surface of constant curvature KK, the area of a geodesic triangle with interior angles α,β,γ\alpha, \beta, \gamma is:

K⋅Area=α+β+γ−πK \cdot \text{Area} = \alpha + \beta + \gamma - \pi
  • On S2S^2 (K=1K = 1): sum of angles >π> \pi, area =α+β+γ−π= \alpha + \beta + \gamma - \pi.
  • On H2\mathbb{H}^2 (K=−1K = -1): sum of angles <π< \pi, area =π−(α+β+γ)= \pi - (\alpha + \beta + \gamma).
  • On R2\mathbb{R}^2 (K=0K = 0): sum of angles =π= \pi, area arbitrary.

Problem 6. Show that the exponential map exp⁡p\exp_p is a radial isometry near the origin (Gauss lemma). Use this to prove that geodesics are locally length-minimizing.

Problem 7. Prove that on a complete Riemannian manifold with non-positive sectional curvature, no two points are conjugate.

Problem 8. Show that the geodesic flow on the unit tangent bundle of a compact Riemannian manifold is a Hamiltonian flow with respect to the natural symplectic structure.

Geodesics are the straightest possible paths on a curved surface. On a flat plane, they are straight lines; on a sphere, they are great circles. The key insight is that a geodesic has zero acceleration as measured along the surface, it does not turn left or right relative to the surface geometry. The exponential map sends a tangent vector to the point you reach by following the geodesic in that direction for unit time, providing local coordinates that straighten out the geometry near a point. On negatively curved surfaces, geodesics diverge rapidly, while on positively curved surfaces they converge, this is why parallel geodesics on a sphere eventually meet.