A set of vectors { v 1 , v 2 , … , v k } ⊆ V \{\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2, \ldots, \mathbf{v}_k\} \subseteq V { v 1 , v 2 , … , v k } ⊆ V is linearly Independent if the equation
α 1 v 1 + α 2 v 2 + ⋯ + α k v k = 0 \alpha_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + \alpha_2 \mathbf{v}_2 + \cdots + \alpha_k \mathbf{v}_k = \mathbf{0} α 1 v 1 + α 2 v 2 + ⋯ + α k v k = 0
Implies α 1 = α 2 = ⋯ = α k = 0 \alpha_1 = \alpha_2 = \cdots = \alpha_k = 0 α 1 = α 2 = ⋯ = α k = 0 . Otherwise the set is linearly dependent .
Proposition 2.1 (Equivalent formulations). The following are equivalent for vectors v 1 , … , v k ∈ V \mathbf{v}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{v}_k \in V v 1 , … , v k ∈ V :
{ v 1 , … , v k } \{\mathbf{v}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{v}_k\} { v 1 , … , v k } is linearly independent.No v j \mathbf{v}_j v j can be written as a linear combination of the remaining vectors. If ∑ i = 1 k α i v i = ∑ i = 1 k β i v i \sum_{i=1}^k \alpha_i \mathbf{v}_i = \sum_{i=1}^k \beta_i \mathbf{v}_i ∑ i = 1 k α i v i = ∑ i = 1 k β i v i Then α i = β i \alpha_i = \beta_i α i = β i for all i i i . Proof. (1 ⇒ \Rightarrow ⇒ 2): If v j = ∑ i ≠ j α i v i \mathbf{v}_j = \sum_{i \neq j} \alpha_i \mathbf{v}_i v j = ∑ i = j α i v i Then ∑ i ≠ j α i v i − v j = 0 \sum_{i \neq j} \alpha_i \mathbf{v}_i - \mathbf{v}_j = \mathbf{0} ∑ i = j α i v i − v j = 0 gives a non-trivial linear Dependence, contradicting (1).
(2 ⇒ \Rightarrow ⇒ 3): If ∑ ( α i − β i ) v i = 0 \sum (\alpha_i - \beta_i)\mathbf{v}_i = \mathbf{0} ∑ ( α i − β i ) v i = 0 Then by linear Independence (which follows from (2)), α i = β i \alpha_i = \beta_i α i = β i for all i i i .
(3 ⇒ \Rightarrow ⇒ 1): If ∑ α i v i = 0 = ∑ 0 ⋅ v i \sum \alpha_i \mathbf{v}_i = \mathbf{0} = \sum 0 \cdot \mathbf{v}_i ∑ α i v i = 0 = ∑ 0 ⋅ v i Then by (3), α i = 0 \alpha_i = 0 α i = 0 for all i i i . ■ \blacksquare ■
The span of a set S ⊆ V S \subseteq V S ⊆ V Denoted s p a n ( S ) \mathrm{span}(S) span ( S ) Is the set of all finite linear Combinations of elements of S S S :
s p a n ( S ) = { ∑ i = 1 k α i v i : k ∈ N , α i ∈ F , v i ∈ S } \mathrm{span}(S) = \left\{ \sum_{i=1}^k \alpha_i \mathbf{v}_i : k \in \mathbb{N},\, \alpha_i \in F,\, \mathbf{v}_i \in S \right\} span ( S ) = { ∑ i = 1 k α i v i : k ∈ N , α i ∈ F , v i ∈ S }
Proposition 2.2. s p a n ( S ) \mathrm{span}(S) span ( S ) is always a subspace of V V V . In fact, s p a n ( S ) \mathrm{span}(S) span ( S ) is The smallest subspace containing S S S : if W W W is any subspace with S ⊆ W S \subseteq W S ⊆ W Then s p a n ( S ) ⊆ W \mathrm{span}(S) \subseteq W span ( S ) ⊆ W .
Proof. s p a n ( S ) \mathrm{span}(S) span ( S ) is non-empty since 0 = 0 ⋅ v \mathbf{0} = 0 \cdot \mathbf{v} 0 = 0 ⋅ v for any v ∈ S \mathbf{v} \in S v ∈ S . Closure under addition and scalar multiplication follows directly from the Definition of linear combinations. For minimality, any subspace W W W containing S S S must contain all Finite linear combinations of elements of S S S by Proposition 1.2, so s p a n ( S ) ⊆ W \mathrm{span}(S) \subseteq W span ( S ) ⊆ W . ■ \blacksquare ■
A set B ⊆ V B \subseteq V B ⊆ V is a basis for V V V if:
B B B is linearly independent, ands p a n ( B ) = V \mathrm{span}(B) = V span ( B ) = V .Theorem 2.1. Every vector space has a basis. All bases of a finite-dimensional vector space have The same number of elements.
The dimension of V V V Denoted dim ( V ) \dim(V) dim ( V ) Is the cardinality of any basis for V V V .
Lemma 2.3 (Steinitz Exchange Lemma). Let { u 1 , … , u k } \{\mathbf{u}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{u}_k\} { u 1 , … , u k } be a linearly Independent set in V V V And let { w 1 , … , w m } \{\mathbf{w}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{w}_m\} { w 1 , … , w m } be a spanning set for V V V . Then k ≤ m k \leq m k ≤ m And after relabelling the w j \mathbf{w}_j w j The set
{ u 1 , … , u k , w k + 1 , … , w m } \{\mathbf{u}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{u}_k, \mathbf{w}_{k+1}, \ldots, \mathbf{w}_m\} { u 1 , … , u k , w k + 1 , … , w m }
Also spans V V V .
Proof. We proceed by induction on k k k . For k = 0 k = 0 k = 0 there is nothing to prove.
Assume the result holds for k − 1 k - 1 k − 1 . Since { u 1 , … , u k } \{\mathbf{u}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{u}_k\} { u 1 , … , u k } is linearly Independent, u k ≠ 0 \mathbf{u}_k \neq \mathbf{0} u k = 0 and u k ∈ s p a n { w 1 , … , w m } \mathbf{u}_k \in \mathrm{span}\{\mathbf{w}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{w}_m\} u k ∈ span { w 1 , … , w m } Since the w j \mathbf{w}_j w j span V V V . Therefore u k = ∑ j = 1 m α j w j \mathbf{u}_k = \sum_{j=1}^m \alpha_j \mathbf{w}_j u k = ∑ j = 1 m α j w j for some α j ∈ F \alpha_j \in F α j ∈ F And not all α j \alpha_j α j are zero.
After relabelling, assume α 1 ≠ 0 \alpha_1 \neq 0 α 1 = 0 . Then w 1 = α 1 − 1 ( u k − ∑ j = 2 m α j w j ) \mathbf{w}_1 = \alpha_1^{-1}(\mathbf{u}_k - \sum_{j=2}^m \alpha_j \mathbf{w}_j) w 1 = α 1 − 1 ( u k − ∑ j = 2 m α j w j ) So w 1 ∈ s p a n { u k , w 2 , … , w m } \mathbf{w}_1 \in \mathrm{span}\{\mathbf{u}_k, \mathbf{w}_2, \ldots, \mathbf{w}_m\} w 1 ∈ span { u k , w 2 , … , w m } . It follows that
s p a n { w 1 , … , w m } = s p a n { u k , w 2 , … , w m } = V \mathrm{span}\{\mathbf{w}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{w}_m\} = \mathrm{span}\{\mathbf{u}_k, \mathbf{w}_2, \ldots, \mathbf{w}_m\} = V span { w 1 , … , w m } = span { u k , w 2 , … , w m } = V
Now { u 1 , … , u k − 1 } \{\mathbf{u}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{u}_{k-1}\} { u 1 , … , u k − 1 } is linearly independent and { u k , w 2 , … , w m } \{\mathbf{u}_k, \mathbf{w}_2, \ldots, \mathbf{w}_m\} { u k , w 2 , … , w m } spans V V V . By the inductive hypothesis, k − 1 ≤ m − 1 k - 1 \leq m - 1 k − 1 ≤ m − 1 (so k ≤ m k \leq m k ≤ m ) and after relabelling, { u 1 , … , u k − 1 , w k , … , w m } \{\mathbf{u}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{u}_{k-1}, \mathbf{w}_k, \ldots, \mathbf{w}_m\} { u 1 , … , u k − 1 , w k , … , w m } spans V V V . Since u k \mathbf{u}_k u k is already in this span, the full set { u 1 , … , u k , w k + 1 , … , w m } \{\mathbf{u}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{u}_k, \mathbf{w}_{k+1}, \ldots, \mathbf{w}_m\} { u 1 , … , u k , w k + 1 , … , w m } also spans V V V . ■ \blacksquare ■
Theorem 2.4 (Dimension is Well-Defined). If V V V is finite-dimensional, then any two bases of V V V have the same number of elements.
Proof. Let B 1 \mathcal{B}_1 B 1 and B 2 \mathcal{B}_2 B 2 be two bases with ∣ B 1 ∣ = k \lvert\mathcal{B}_1\rvert = k ∣ B 1 ∣ = k and ∣ B 2 ∣ = m \lvert\mathcal{B}_2\rvert = m ∣ B 2 ∣ = m . Applying the Steinitz exchange lemma with B 1 \mathcal{B}_1 B 1 as the Independent set and B 2 \mathcal{B}_2 B 2 as the spanning set gives k ≤ m k \leq m k ≤ m . Swapping roles gives m ≤ k m \leq k m ≤ k . Hence k = m k = m k = m . ■ \blacksquare ■
Theorem 2.5 (Dimension Formula). If U U U and W W W are subspaces of a finite-dimensional vector Space V V V Then
dim ( U + W ) = dim ( U ) + dim ( W ) − dim ( U ∩ W ) \dim(U + W) = \dim(U) + \dim(W) - \dim(U \cap W) dim ( U + W ) = dim ( U ) + dim ( W ) − dim ( U ∩ W )
Theorem 2.6 (Rank-Nullity Theorem). Let A ∈ M m × n ( F ) A \in \mathcal{M}_{m \times n}(F) A ∈ M m × n ( F ) . Then
r a n k ( A ) + n u l l i t y ( A ) = n \mathrm{rank}(A) + \mathrm{nullity}(A) = n rank ( A ) + nullity ( A ) = n
Where r a n k ( A ) = dim ( c o l ( A ) ) \mathrm{rank}(A) = \dim(\mathrm{col}(A)) rank ( A ) = dim ( col ( A )) and n u l l i t y ( A ) = dim ( n u l l ( A ) ) \mathrm{nullity}(A) = \dim(\mathrm{null}(A)) nullity ( A ) = dim ( null ( A )) .
Proof. Let { v 1 , … , v k } \{\mathbf{v}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{v}_k\} { v 1 , … , v k } be a basis for n u l l ( A ) \mathrm{null}(A) null ( A ) Where k = n u l l i t y ( A ) k = \mathrm{nullity}(A) k = nullity ( A ) . Extend this to a basis { v 1 , … , v k , v k + 1 , … , v n } \{\mathbf{v}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{v}_k, \mathbf{v}_{k+1}, \ldots, \mathbf{v}_n\} { v 1 , … , v k , v k + 1 , … , v n } for F n F^n F n .
We claim that { A v k + 1 , … , A v n } \{A\mathbf{v}_{k+1}, \ldots, A\mathbf{v}_n\} { A v k + 1 , … , A v n } is a basis for c o l ( A ) \mathrm{col}(A) col ( A ) .
Spanning: For any y ∈ c o l ( A ) \mathbf{y} \in \mathrm{col}(A) y ∈ col ( A ) There exists x ∈ F n \mathbf{x} \in F^n x ∈ F n With y = A x \mathbf{y} = A\mathbf{x} y = A x . Writing x = ∑ i = 1 n α i v i \mathbf{x} = \sum_{i=1}^n \alpha_i \mathbf{v}_i x = ∑ i = 1 n α i v i
y = A ( ∑ i = 1 n α i v i ) = ∑ i = 1 n α i A v i = ∑ i = k + 1 n α i A v i \mathbf{y} = A\left(\sum_{i=1}^n \alpha_i \mathbf{v}_i\right) = \sum_{i=1}^n \alpha_i A\mathbf{v}_i = \sum_{i=k+1}^n \alpha_i A\mathbf{v}_i y = A ( ∑ i = 1 n α i v i ) = ∑ i = 1 n α i A v i = ∑ i = k + 1 n α i A v i
Since A v i = 0 A\mathbf{v}_i = \mathbf{0} A v i = 0 for i ≤ k i \leq k i ≤ k .
Linear independence: If ∑ i = k + 1 n α i A v i = 0 \sum_{i=k+1}^n \alpha_i A\mathbf{v}_i = \mathbf{0} ∑ i = k + 1 n α i A v i = 0 Then A ( ∑ i = k + 1 n α i v i ) = 0 A\left(\sum_{i=k+1}^n \alpha_i \mathbf{v}_i\right) = \mathbf{0} A ( ∑ i = k + 1 n α i v i ) = 0 So ∑ i = k + 1 n α i v i ∈ n u l l ( A ) \sum_{i=k+1}^n \alpha_i \mathbf{v}_i \in \mathrm{null}(A) ∑ i = k + 1 n α i v i ∈ null ( A ) . Since { v 1 , … , v k } \{\mathbf{v}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{v}_k\} { v 1 , … , v k } Is a basis for the null space, ∑ i = k + 1 n α i v i = ∑ i = 1 k β i v i \sum_{i=k+1}^n \alpha_i \mathbf{v}_i = \sum_{i=1}^k \beta_i \mathbf{v}_i ∑ i = k + 1 n α i v i = ∑ i = 1 k β i v i For some β i \beta_i β i Giving ∑ i = 1 n ( − β i ) v i + ∑ i = k + 1 n α i v i = 0 \sum_{i=1}^n (-\beta_i)\mathbf{v}_i + \sum_{i=k+1}^n \alpha_i \mathbf{v}_i = \mathbf{0} ∑ i = 1 n ( − β i ) v i + ∑ i = k + 1 n α i v i = 0 . By linear independence of the full basis, α i = 0 \alpha_i = 0 α i = 0 for all i ≥ k + 1 i \geq k + 1 i ≥ k + 1 .
Therefore r a n k ( A ) = n − k = n − n u l l i t y ( A ) \mathrm{rank}(A) = n - k = n - \mathrm{nullity}(A) rank ( A ) = n − k = n − nullity ( A ) . ■ \blacksquare ■
Problem. Find a basis for and the dimension of the subspace W = s p a n { ( 1 , 2 , − 1 , 0 ) , ( 3 , 1 , 0 , 2 ) , ( − 1 , 3 , − 2 , − 2 ) } W = \mathrm{span}\{(1, 2, -1, 0), (3, 1, 0, 2), (-1, 3, -2, -2)\} W = span {( 1 , 2 , − 1 , 0 ) , ( 3 , 1 , 0 , 2 ) , ( − 1 , 3 , − 2 , − 2 )} of R 4 \mathbb{R}^4 R 4 .
Solution Form the matrix whose rows are the given vectors and row-reduce:
( 1 2 − 1 0 3 1 0 2 − 1 3 − 2 − 2 ) → R 2 − 3 R 1 ( 1 2 − 1 0 0 − 5 3 2 − 1 3 − 2 − 2 ) \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & -1 & 0 \\ 3 & 1 & 0 & 2 \\ -1 & 3 & -2 & -2 \end{pmatrix} \xrightarrow{R_2 - 3R_1} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & -5 & 3 & 2 \\ -1 & 3 & -2 & -2 \end{pmatrix} 1 3 − 1 2 1 3 − 1 0 − 2 0 2 − 2 R 2 − 3 R 1 1 0 − 1 2 − 5 3 − 1 3 − 2 0 2 − 2
→ R 3 + R 1 ( 1 2 − 1 0 0 − 5 3 2 0 5 − 3 − 2 ) → R 3 + R 2 ( 1 2 − 1 0 0 − 5 3 2 0 0 0 0 ) \xrightarrow{R_3 + R_1} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & -5 & 3 & 2 \\ 0 & 5 & -3 & -2 \end{pmatrix} \xrightarrow{R_3 + R_2} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & -5 & 3 & 2 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} R 3 + R 1 1 0 0 2 − 5 5 − 1 3 − 3 0 2 − 2 R 3 + R 2 1 0 0 2 − 5 0 − 1 3 0 0 2 0
The row echelon form has two non-zero rows, so dim ( W ) = 2 \dim(W) = 2 dim ( W ) = 2 . A basis is given by the non-zero Rows: { ( 1 , 2 , − 1 , 0 ) , ( 0 , − 5 , 3 , 2 ) } \{(1, 2, -1, 0), (0, -5, 3, 2)\} {( 1 , 2 , − 1 , 0 ) , ( 0 , − 5 , 3 , 2 )} . ■ \blacksquare ■
Problem. Find a basis for the null space of
A = ( 1 2 1 − 1 2 4 0 1 0 0 1 3 ) A = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 1 & -1 \\ 2 & 4 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end{pmatrix} A = 1 2 0 2 4 0 1 0 1 − 1 1 3
Solution Row-reduce A A A :
( 1 2 1 − 1 2 4 0 1 0 0 1 3 ) → R 2 − 2 R 1 ( 1 2 1 − 1 0 0 − 2 3 0 0 1 3 ) → R 3 + R 2 / 2 ( 1 2 1 − 1 0 0 − 2 3 0 0 0 9 / 2 ) \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 1 & -1 \\ 2 & 4 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end{pmatrix} \xrightarrow{R_2 - 2R_1} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & -2 & 3 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end{pmatrix} \xrightarrow{R_3 + R_2/2} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & -2 & 3 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 9/2 \end{pmatrix} 1 2 0 2 4 0 1 0 1 − 1 1 3 R 2 − 2 R 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 − 2 1 − 1 3 3 R 3 + R 2 /2 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 − 2 0 − 1 3 9/2
This has pivots in columns 1, 3, and 4. The free variable is x 2 x_2 x 2 . Setting x 2 = t x_2 = t x 2 = t and Back-substituting: x 4 = 0 x_4 = 0 x 4 = 0 , x 3 = 0 x_3 = 0 x 3 = 0 , x 1 = − 2 t x_1 = -2t x 1 = − 2 t . The null space is { t ( − 2 , 1 , 0 , 0 ) : t ∈ R } \{t(-2, 1, 0, 0) : t \in \mathbb{R}\} { t ( − 2 , 1 , 0 , 0 ) : t ∈ R } With basis { ( − 2 , 1 , 0 , 0 ) } \{(-2, 1, 0, 0)\} {( − 2 , 1 , 0 , 0 )} and dimension 1. ■ \blacksquare ■
Problem. Determine whether the vectors v 1 = ( 1 , 2 , 3 ) \mathbf{v}_1 = (1, 2, 3) v 1 = ( 1 , 2 , 3 ) , v 2 = ( 4 , 5 , 6 ) \mathbf{v}_2 = (4, 5, 6) v 2 = ( 4 , 5 , 6 ) , v 3 = ( 7 , 8 , 9 ) \mathbf{v}_3 = (7, 8, 9) v 3 = ( 7 , 8 , 9 ) form a basis For R 3 \mathbb{R}^3 R 3 .
Solution Form the matrix A = [ v 1 ∣ v 2 ∣ v 3 ] A = [\mathbf{v}_1 \mid \mathbf{v}_2 \mid \mathbf{v}_3] A = [ v 1 ∣ v 2 ∣ v 3 ] and compute Its determinant:
det ( A ) = 1 ( 45 − 48 ) − 2 ( 36 − 42 ) + 3 ( 32 − 35 ) = − 3 + 12 − 9 = 0 \det(A) = 1(45 - 48) - 2(36 - 42) + 3(32 - 35) = -3 + 12 - 9 = 0 det ( A ) = 1 ( 45 − 48 ) − 2 ( 36 − 42 ) + 3 ( 32 − 35 ) = − 3 + 12 − 9 = 0
Since det ( A ) = 0 \det(A) = 0 det ( A ) = 0 The columns are linearly dependent, so { v 1 , v 2 , v 3 } \{\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2, \mathbf{v}_3\} { v 1 , v 2 , v 3 } Is not a basis. In fact, v 3 − 2 v 2 + v 1 = 0 \mathbf{v}_3 - 2\mathbf{v}_2 + \mathbf{v}_1 = \mathbf{0} v 3 − 2 v 2 + v 1 = 0 .
■ \blacksquare ■
Tip
whose Columns are those vectors. If det ≠ 0 \det \neq 0 det = 0 They form a basis; if det = 0 \det = 0 det = 0 They do not.
Problem. Let V = P 3 ( R ) V = \mathcal{P}_3(\mathbb{R}) V = P 3 ( R ) (polynomials of degree at most 3). Find the dimension Of the subspace W = { p ∈ P 3 : p ( 1 ) = p ( − 1 ) = 0 } W = \{p \in \mathcal{P}_3 : p(1) = p(-1) = 0\} W = { p ∈ P 3 : p ( 1 ) = p ( − 1 ) = 0 } .
Solution Write p ( x ) = a x 3 + b x 2 + c x + d p(x) = ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d p ( x ) = a x 3 + b x 2 + c x + d . The conditions are:
p ( 1 ) = a + b + c + d = 0 p(1) = a + b + c + d = 0 p ( 1 ) = a + b + c + d = 0 and p ( − 1 ) = − a + b − c + d = 0 p(-1) = -a + b - c + d = 0 p ( − 1 ) = − a + b − c + d = 0 .
Adding: 2 b + 2 d = 0 2b + 2d = 0 2 b + 2 d = 0 So d = − b d = -b d = − b . Subtracting: 2 a + 2 c = 0 2a + 2c = 0 2 a + 2 c = 0 So c = − a c = -a c = − a .
Therefore p ( x ) = a x 3 + b x 2 − a x − b = a ( x 3 − x ) + b ( x 2 − 1 ) p(x) = ax^3 + bx^2 - ax - b = a(x^3 - x) + b(x^2 - 1) p ( x ) = a x 3 + b x 2 − a x − b = a ( x 3 − x ) + b ( x 2 − 1 ) .
A basis for W W W is { x 3 − x , x 2 − 1 } \{x^3 - x, x^2 - 1\} { x 3 − x , x 2 − 1 } And dim ( W ) = 2 \dim(W) = 2 dim ( W ) = 2 .
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 2.7 (Worked Examples).
Linear independence captures the idea that no vector in the set is “redundant.” If you have three vectors in R 3 \mathbb{R}^3 R 3 and one of them lies in the plane spanned by the other two, then that third vector adds no new directions. The three vectors are linearly dependent, and their span is a plane (2-dimensional), not all of R 3 \mathbb{R}^3 R 3 .
Span answers the question: “What is the largest subspace I can reach using these vectors?” If you think of each vector as an arrow, the span is the set of all destinations you can reach by traveling along these arrows (and their negatives), possibly stretching them. For two non-parallel vectors in R 3 \mathbb{R}^3 R 3 , the span is a plane through the origin.
Basis combines both ideas: a basis is a set that spans the entire space with no redundancy. It is a “minimal spanning set” and a “maximal linearly independent set” simultaneously.
Dimension counts the number of independent directions. R 3 \mathbb{R}^3 R 3 has dimension 3 because you need exactly three independent vectors (e.g., the standard basis e 1 , e 2 , e 3 \mathbf{e}_1, \mathbf{e}_2, \mathbf{e}_3 e 1 , e 2 , e 3 ) to reach every point. No two vectors suffice, and four vectors must be linearly dependent.
The key theorem (Steinitz exchange) says that any linearly independent set can be extended to a basis by swapping in vectors from any spanning set. This is analogous to the following physical process: given a set of non-redundant directions and a set of directions that cover all of space, you can systematically replace redundant spanning directions with your independent ones.
Problem. Find a basis for the row space of A = ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ) A = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 3 \\ 4 & 5 & 6 \\ 7 & 8 & 9 \end{pmatrix} A = 1 4 7 2 5 8 3 6 9 and determine its dimension.
Solution Row-reduce A A A :
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ) → R 2 − 4 R 1 , R 3 − 7 R 1 ( 1 2 3 0 − 3 − 6 0 − 6 − 12 ) \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 3 \\ 4 & 5 & 6 \\ 7 & 8 & 9 \end{pmatrix} \xrightarrow{R_2 - 4R_1, R_3 - 7R_1} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 3 \\ 0 & -3 & -6 \\ 0 & -6 & -12 \end{pmatrix} 1 4 7 2 5 8 3 6 9 R 2 − 4 R 1 , R 3 − 7 R 1 1 0 0 2 − 3 − 6 3 − 6 − 12
→ R 3 − 2 R 2 ( 1 2 3 0 − 3 − 6 0 0 0 ) \xrightarrow{R_3 - 2R_2} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 3 \\ 0 & -3 & -6 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} R 3 − 2 R 2 1 0 0 2 − 3 0 3 − 6 0
The non-zero rows form a basis for the row space: { ( 1 , 2 , 3 ) , ( 0 , − 3 , − 6 ) } \{(1, 2, 3), (0, -3, -6)\} {( 1 , 2 , 3 ) , ( 0 , − 3 , − 6 )} , or equivalently { ( 1 , 2 , 3 ) , ( 0 , 1 , 2 ) } \{(1, 2, 3), (0, 1, 2)\} {( 1 , 2 , 3 ) , ( 0 , 1 , 2 )} after scaling. The dimension of the row space is 2.
Note that r a n k ( A ) = 2 < 3 = n \mathrm{rank}(A) = 2 < 3 = n rank ( A ) = 2 < 3 = n , so A A A is singular. The null space has dimension 3 − 2 = 1 3 - 2 = 1 3 − 2 = 1 , with basis { ( 1 , − 2 , 1 ) T } \{(1, -2, 1)^T\} {( 1 , − 2 , 1 ) T } .
Connection to determinants: det ( A ) = 0 \det(A) = 0 det ( A ) = 0 because the rank is less than 3, which is consistent with the fact that the columns (and rows) are linearly dependent. Indeed, the third column equals twice the second minus the first: 3 = 2 ( 2 ) − 1 3 = 2(2) - 1 3 = 2 ( 2 ) − 1 , 6 = 2 ( 5 ) − 4 6 = 2(5) - 4 6 = 2 ( 5 ) − 4 , 9 = 2 ( 8 ) − 7 9 = 2(8) - 7 9 = 2 ( 8 ) − 7 . ■ \blacksquare ■
Linear independence of infinitely many vectors. The definition only directly applies to finite subsets. A set S S S is linearly independent if every finite subset of S S S is linearly independent.Dimension and spanning. A set of n n n vectors in R n \mathbb{R}^n R n that spans R n \mathbb{R}^n R n must be linearly independent (and hence a basis). Similarly, n n n linearly independent vectors in R n \mathbb{R}^n R n must span R n \mathbb{R}^n R n .The empty set spans { 0 } \{\mathbf{0}\} { 0 } . The span of the empty set is the trivial subspace, and the empty set is a basis for { 0 } \{\mathbf{0}\} { 0 } . The dimension of the zero space is 0.Row space and column space have the same dimension (rank), but are different subspaces. The row space is a subspace of R n \mathbb{R}^n R n (rows of A A A ), while the column space is a subspace of R m \mathbb{R}^m R m (columns of A A A ). For non-square matrices, they live in different ambient spaces.A basis is not unique. Any set of n n n linearly independent vectors in R n \mathbb{R}^n R n is a basis. The standard basis is convenient but not special. Changing basis corresponds to a change of coordinates, and the dimension is invariant under such changes. A[2_Linear Independence Span Basis And Dimension] --> B[Key Concepts]
A --> D[Practical Applications]
B --> E[Fundamental definitions]
D --> G[Real-world usage]
Vectors and Vector Spaces : Linear independence, span, and basis are fundamental properties of vector spaces.Matrices : The rank of a matrix equals the dimension of its column space, connecting matrix theory to basis theory.Systems of Linear Equations : The solution space of a homogeneous system is a subspace whose dimension is determined by rank-nullity.