Let (fn) be a sequence of functions defined on a set E⊆R.
Definition.(fn)converges pointwise to f on E if for every x∈E and every ε>0There exists N∈N (depending on both x and ε) such that ∣fn(x)−f(x)∣<ε for all n≥N.
Example. Let fn(x)=xn on E=[0,1]. For each x∈[0,1), fn(x)=xn→0 And fn(1)=1 for all n. So fn converges pointwise to
f(x)={01if0≤x<1ifx=1
Note that each fn is continuous, but the pointwise limit f is not continuous at x=1.
Definition.(fn)converges uniformly to f on E if for every ε>0There Exists N∈N (depending only on εNot on x) such that for all x∈E:
∣fn(x)−f(x)∣<εforalln≥N
Equivalently, supx∈E∣fn(x)−f(x)∣→0 as n→∞.
Proposition 7.1. Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. The converse is false.
Example (continued).fn(x)=xn on [0,1] converges pointwise but not uniformly. We have supx∈[0,1]∣fn(x)−f(x)∣=supx∈[0,1)xn=1 for all n (since the supremum is Approached as x→1−). This does not tend to 0.
However, on [0,r] for any r<1: supx∈[0,r]∣xn∣=rn→0 So the convergence Is uniform on [0,r].
Theorem 7.1 (Weierstrass M-Test). Let (fn) be a sequence of functions on E. If there exists a Sequence (Mn) of non-negative real numbers such that ∣fn(x)∣≤Mn for all x∈E and all n And ∑n=1∞Mn<∞ Then ∑n=1∞fn converges uniformly on E.
Proof. Let Sn(x)=∑k=1nfk(x) and Tn=∑k=1nMk. Since ∑Mk converges, (Tn) is a Cauchy sequence. Given ε>0There exists N such that for m>n≥N:
Theorem 7.2. If (fn) is a sequence of continuous functions on E converging uniformly to f On E Then f is continuous on E.
Proof. Let c∈E and ε>0. Since fn→f uniformly, choose N such that ∣fN(x)−f(x)∣<ε/3 for all x∈E. Since fN is continuous at cChoose δ>0 such that ∣x−c∣<δ implies ∣fN(x)−fN(c)∣<ε/3. Then:
Theorem 7.3. If (fn) is a sequence of Riemann integrable functions on [a,b] converging Uniformly to f on [a,b] Then f is Riemann integrable and
limn→∞∫abfn(x)dx=∫abf(x)dx
Proof. Since (fn) converges uniformly, f is the uniform limit of integrable functions. Given ε>0Choose N with sup∣fN(x)−f(x)∣<ε/(2(b−a)) for all x∈[a,b]. Then fN−ε/(2(b−a))≤f(x)≤fN(x)+ε/(2(b−a)) for all x And by Integrability of fN:
∫abfN−2ε≤∫abf≤∫abf≤∫abfN+2ε
So ∫f−∫f≤εProving f is integrable. For the limit:
Uniform convergence of functions does not guarantee convergence of derivatives. A stronger Hypothesis is needed.
Theorem 7.4. Suppose (fn) is a sequence of differentiable functions on [a,b] such that:
(fn(c)) converges for some c∈[a,b]
(fn") converges uniformly on [a,b]
Then (fn) converges uniformly to a differentiable function f on [a,b] And f′(x)=limn→∞fn′(x).
Proof. Let g=limfn′ (uniform limit). Define f(x)=limn→∞[fn(c)+∫cxfn′(t)dt]. By Theorem 7.3, ∫cxfn′(t)dt→∫cxg(t)dt So f(x)=f(c)+∫cxg(t)dt. By FTC Part 1, f is differentiable and f′(x)=g(x). Uniform convergence of fn to f follows From the estimate ∣fn(x)−f(x)∣≤∣fn(c)−f(c)∣+∫ab∣fn′(t)−g(t)∣dt. ■
A power series centered at a is a series of the form ∑n=0∞cn(x−a)n.
Theorem 7.5 (Radius of Convergence). Every power series ∑cn(x−a)n has a radius of ConvergenceR∈[0,∞] such that:
The series converges absolutely for ∣x−a∣<R
The series diverges for ∣x−a∣>R
The behavior at ∣x−a∣=R must be checked separately
The radius is given by 1/R=limsupn→∞n∣cn∣ (Cauchy-Hadamard formula), or When the limit exists, R=limn→∞∣cn/cn+1∣.
Proof. Apply the root test to ∑∣cn(x−a)n∣: limsupn∣cn∣∣x−a∣=∣x−a∣/R (where 1/R=limsupn∣cn∣). The root test gives convergence when ∣x−a∣/R<1 And divergence when ∣x−a∣/R>1. ■
Theorem 7.6. A power series converges uniformly on every compact subset of its open disk of Convergence.
Theorem 7.6a (Differentiation and Integration of Power Series). If f(x)=∑n=0∞cn(x−a)n Has radius of convergence R>0 Then:
f is differentiable on (a−R,a+R) and f′(x)=∑n=1∞ncn(x−a)n−1 (same R).
f is infinitely differentiable on (a−R,a+R) And f(k)(x)=∑n=k∞(n−k)!n!cn(x−a)n−k.
∫axf(t)dt=∑n=0∞n+1cn(x−a)n+1 for ∣x−a∣<R.
cn=f(n)(a)/n! (uniqueness of power series coefficients).
Proof. The differentiated series ∑ncn(x−a)n−1 has the same radius of convergence as The original (by the Cauchy-Hadamard formula, since nn→1). By Theorem 7.4, the Derivative of the sum equals the sum of the derivatives. Parts (2), (3), and (4) follow by Induction and the FTC. ■
Theorem 7.6b (Abel’s Theorem). If ∑n=0∞cn converges to L Then
limx→1−∑n=0∞cnxn=L
That is, the power series is continuous from the left at the endpoint x=1.
Proof (sketch). Let sn=∑k=0nck and sn→L. Write the partial sum ∑k=0nckxk=∑k=0n(sk−sk−1)xk (with s−1=0) and use summation by Parts to express this as snxn+∑k=0n−1sk(xk−xk+1). Letting n→∞ and using That sn→L and xn→0 for ∣x∣<1One shows the expression tends to L as x→1−. ■
Example. Since ∑k=1∞(−1)k+1/k=ln2Abel’s theorem gives limx→1−∑k=1∞(−1)k+1xk/k=ln2I.e., ln2 is the left-hand limit Of −ln(1−x) at x=1.
Worked Example: Show $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n^2}$ converges uniformly on $[-1, 1]$
Solution. For x∈[−1,1]: n2xn≤n21. Since ∑n=1∞n21 converges (it is a p-series with p=2>1), the Weierstrass M-Test with Mn=1/n2 implies the series converges uniformly on [−1,1]. ■
Worked Example: Find the radius of convergence of $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n!}$
Solution. Apply the ratio test to the coefficients: limn→∞cncn+1=limn→∞(n+1)!n!=limn→∞n+11=0.
So R=∞ and the series converges for all x∈R. This is the power series for ex. By Theorem 7.4, the derivative of the sum equals ∑n=1∞n!nxn−1=∑n=1∞(n−1)!xn−1=∑k=0∞k!xk=ex, confirming That ex is its own derivative. ■
Worked Example: Find the radius of convergence of $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n! \, x^n$
Solution. Apply the ratio test to the coefficients:
Worked Example: Show $f_n(x) = \frac{x}{1 + nx}$ converges uniformly on $[1, \infty)$
Solution.Pointwise limit: For x≥1: limn→∞1+nxx=limn→∞1/x+n1=0.
Uniform convergence:supx∈[1,∞)1+nxx−0=supx≥11+nxx. To find the maximum, differentiate with respect to x: dxd(1+nxx)=(1+nx)21>0. So the function is increasing in x on [1,∞) And:
supx≥11+nxx=limx→∞1+nxx=n1
Since sup∣fn∣=1/n→0The convergence is uniform on [1,∞). ■
Mistake 1: Assuming pointwise convergence preserves continuity Students often assume that if a sequence of continuous functions converges pointwise, the limit must be continuous. The classic counterexample is fn(x)=xn on [0,1], which converges pointwise to a discontinuous function. Only uniform convergence guarantees that the limit of continuous functions is continuous.
Mistake 2: Confusing uniform convergence of fn with uniform convergence of fn′ The Weierstrass M-test or direct estimation shows that fn→f uniformly, but students incorrectly conclude fn′→f′ uniformly. Theorem 7.4 requires uniform convergence of the derivativesfn′, not the functions fn themselves, to interchange differentiation and limits.
Mistake 3: Forgetting to check endpoints when computing radius of convergence When applying the ratio or root test, students find R but assume the series converges for ∣x−a∣=R. The boundary behaviour must be checked separately — a series may converge at one endpoint, both, or neither. For example, ∑xn/n has R=1 but converges only at x=−1 on the boundary.
A sequence of functions converges pointwise if each point eventually stabilises, but this is too weak to preserve analytical properties — the limit of continuous functions can be discontinuous. Uniform convergence demands that all points stabilise simultaneously: given any tolerance, there is a single N beyond which every point in the domain is within that tolerance. Think of it as the difference between each person eventually sitting down (pointwise) versus everyone sitting down at the same command (uniform). Power series are the paradigmatic example: within their radius of convergence, they converge uniformly on compact sets, which justifies term-by-term differentiation and integration.