Skip to content

Problem Set | Mathematics - Wyatt's Notes

Problem 1. Let A,BRA, B \subseteq \mathbb{R} be non-empty and bounded above. Prove that sup(AB)=max(supA,supB)\sup(A \cup B) = \max(\sup A, \sup B).

Solution

Solution. Let M=max(supA,supB)M = \max(\sup A, \sup B). Without loss, assume supAsupB\sup A \geq \sup B So M=supAM = \sup A. For all xABx \in A \cup B: either xAx \in A So xsupA=Mx \leq \sup A = M; or xBx \in B So xsupBMx \leq \sup B \leq M. Thus MM is an upper bound for ABA \cup B.

For the least property: since M=supAM = \sup A and AABA \subseteq A \cup BEvery upper bound of ABA \cup B Is an upper bound of AAHence supA=M\geq \sup A = M. Therefore sup(AB)=M\sup(A \cup B) = M. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 1.3 (Supremum and Infimum), Section 1.5 (Properties).

Problem 2. Prove that infA=sup(A)\inf A = -\sup(-A) for any non-empty bounded set ARA \subseteq \mathbb{R}.

Solution

Solution. Let u=sup(A)u = \sup(-A). For all aAa \in A: aA-a \in -A So au-a \leq uGiving aua \geq -u. Thus u-u is a lower bound for AA. If vv is any lower bound for AA Then v-v is an upper bound for A-A So uvu \leq -vI.e., uv-u \geq v. Hence u-u is the greatest lower bound, so infA=u=sup(A)\inf A = -u = -\sup(-A). \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 1.5 (Properties of Supremum and Infimum).

Problem 3. Using the ε\varepsilon-NN definition, prove that limnn2+3n2n2+1=12\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{n^2 + 3n}{2n^2 + 1} = \frac{1}{2}.

Solution

Solution. Let ε>0\varepsilon > 0. Compute:

n2+3n2n2+112=2(n2+3n)(2n2+1)2(2n2+1)=6n12(2n2+1)\left|\frac{n^2 + 3n}{2n^2 + 1} - \frac{1}{2}\right| = \left|\frac{2(n^2 + 3n) - (2n^2 + 1)}{2(2n^2 + 1)}\right| = \left|\frac{6n - 1}{2(2n^2 + 1)}\right|

For n1n \geq 1: 6n1<6n6n - 1 \lt 6n and 2n2+1>2n22n^2 + 1 > 2n^2 So

6n12(2n2+1)<6n4n2=32n\frac{6n - 1}{2(2n^2 + 1)} \lt \frac{6n}{4n^2} = \frac{3}{2n}

We need 32n<ε\frac{3}{2n} \lt \varepsilonI.e., n>3/(2ε)n > 3/(2\varepsilon). Choose N=3/(2ε)N = \lceil 3/(2\varepsilon) \rceil. For nNn \geq N: the expression is <ε\lt \varepsilon. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 2.1 (Convergence), Section 2.7 (Worked Examples).

Problem 4. Let a1=1a_1 = 1 and an+1=12(an+2an)a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2}\left(a_n + \frac{2}{a_n}\right). Prove (an)(a_n) converges And find its limit.

Solution

Solution. Step 1: (an)(a_n) is bounded below by 2\sqrt{2}. By AM-GM: an+1=12(an+2/an)an2/an=2a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2}(a_n + 2/a_n) \geq \sqrt{a_n \cdot 2/a_n} = \sqrt{2}.

Step 2: (an)(a_n) is decreasing for n2n \geq 2. Note a1=1a_1 = 1, a2=3/2a_2 = 3/2. an+1an=12(an+2/an)an=12(2/anan)=2an22ana_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{1}{2}(a_n + 2/a_n) - a_n = \frac{1}{2}(2/a_n - a_n) = \frac{2 - a_n^2}{2a_n}. Since an2a_n \geq \sqrt{2} for n2n \geq 2, an22a_n^2 \geq 2 So an+1an0a_{n+1} - a_n \leq 0.

Step 3: By the Monotone Convergence Theorem, L=limanL = \lim a_n exists. Taking limits: L=12(L+2/L)L = \frac{1}{2}(L + 2/L)Giving 2L=L+2/L2L = L + 2/L So L=2/LL = 2/LHence L2=2L^2 = 2. Since an2a_n \geq \sqrt{2} for n2n \geq 2, L0L \geq 0 So L=2L = \sqrt{2}. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 2.2 (Monotone Convergence Theorem), Section 2.7 (recursive sequences).

Problem 5. Compute lim supnan\limsup_{n \to \infty} a_n and lim infnan\liminf_{n \to \infty} a_n for an=2+(1)nnn+1a_n = 2 + (-1)^n \frac{n}{n+1}.

Solution

Solution. Write an=2+(1)nnn+1a_n = 2 + (-1)^n \cdot \frac{n}{n+1}.

For even n=2kn = 2k: a2k=2+2k2k+12+1=3a_{2k} = 2 + \frac{2k}{2k+1} \to 2 + 1 = 3. For odd n=2k1n = 2k - 1: a2k1=22k12k21=1a_{2k-1} = 2 - \frac{2k-1}{2k} \to 2 - 1 = 1.

Since these are the only two subsequential limits: lim supan=3\limsup a_n = 3 and lim infan=1\liminf a_n = 1. The sequence diverges since lim suplim inf\limsup \neq \liminf. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 2.6 (Limit Superior and Limit Inferior).

Problem 6. Determine whether n=21n(lnn)2\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n(\ln n)^2} converges.

Solution

Solution. Apply the integral test with f(x)=1/(x(lnx)2)f(x) = 1/(x(\ln x)^2) on [2,)[2, \infty). The function is Positive, continuous, and decreasing. Compute via u=lnxu = \ln x, du=dx/xdu = dx/x:

21x(lnx)2dx=ln21u2du=[1u]ln2=1ln2<\int_2^{\infty} \frac{1}{x(\ln x)^2}\, dx = \int_{\ln 2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{u^2}\, du = \left[-\frac{1}{u}\right]_{\ln 2}^{\infty} = \frac{1}{\ln 2} \lt \infty

The integral converges, so by the integral test, the series converges. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 3.2 (Integral Test), Section 3.6 (Worked Examples).

Problem 7. Does n=1(1)n+1n1/3\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n^{1/3}} converge absolutely, conditionally, or diverge?

Solution

Solution. The absolute series is 1/n1/3\sum 1/n^{1/3}Which is a pp-series with p=1/3<1p = 1/3 \lt 1 So it diverges. Hence the series does not converge absolutely.

For conditional convergence, apply the alternating series test: an=1/n1/3a_n = 1/n^{1/3} is positive, Decreasing, and an0a_n \to 0. Therefore (1)n+1/n1/3\sum (-1)^{n+1}/n^{1/3} converges.

Since it converges but not absolutely, it converges conditionally. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 3.3 (Absolute and Conditional Convergence), Section 3.6 (Alternating Series Test).

Problem 8. Find the sum of n=11n(n+2)\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n(n+2)}.

Solution

Solution. Use partial fractions: 1n(n+2)=12(1n1n+2)\frac{1}{n(n+2)} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{n} - \frac{1}{n+2}\right). The NN-th partial sum telescopes:

SN=12[(1113)+(1214)+(1315)++(1N1N+2)]S_N = \frac{1}{2}\left[\left(\frac{1}{1} - \frac{1}{3}\right) + \left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{4}\right) + \left(\frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{5}\right) + \cdots + \left(\frac{1}{N} - \frac{1}{N+2}\right)\right]

Most terms cancel. The surviving terms are:

SN=12(1+121N+11N+2)S_N = \frac{1}{2}\left(1 + \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{N+1} - \frac{1}{N+2}\right)

As NN \to \infty: SN12(1+1/2)=34S_N \to \frac{1}{2}(1 + 1/2) = \frac{3}{4}. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 3.1 (Definitions and Convergence), telescoping series.

Problem 9. Give an explicit rearrangement of n=1(1)n+1n\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} whose sum is 00.

Solution

Solution. By the Riemann Rearrangement Theorem, such a rearrangement exists. We construct it Explicitly. The positive terms are 1,1/3,1/5,1, 1/3, 1/5, \ldots and the negative terms are 1/2,1/4,1/6,-1/2, -1/4, -1/6, \ldots.

Start: S1=1S_1 = 1. Then add negative terms until we go below 00: S2=11/2=1/2>0S_2 = 1 - 1/2 = 1/2 > 0. S3=11/21/4=1/4>0S_3 = 1 - 1/2 - 1/4 = 1/4 > 0. S4=11/21/41/6=1/12<0S_4 = 1 - 1/2 - 1/4 - 1/6 = -1/12 \lt 0.

Then add positive terms until we exceed 00: S5=1/12+1/3=1/4>0S_5 = -1/12 + 1/3 = 1/4 > 0.

Then add negative terms until below 00: S6=1/41/8=1/8>0S_6 = 1/4 - 1/8 = 1/8 > 0. S7=1/81/10=1/40>0S_7 = 1/8 - 1/10 = 1/40 > 0. S8=1/401/12=7/120<0S_8 = 1/40 - 1/12 = -7/120 \lt 0.

Continue this process. Since 1/(2k1)=\sum 1/(2k-1) = \infty and 1/(2k)=\sum 1/(2k) = \inftyWe can always Continue. Since 1/n01/n \to 0The oscillations shrink to 00. The resulting rearrangement converges to 00. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 3.5 (Rearrangement of Series).

Problem 10. Prove using ε\varepsilon-δ\delta that f(x)=x3f(x) = x^3 is continuous at every aRa \in \mathbb{R}.

Solution

Solution. Let aRa \in \mathbb{R} and ε>0\varepsilon > 0. Compute:

f(x)f(a)=x3a3=xax2+ax+a2|f(x) - f(a)| = |x^3 - a^3| = |x - a| \cdot |x^2 + ax + a^2|

Restrict to xa<1|x - a| \lt 1 So x<a+1|x| \lt |a| + 1Giving x2+ax+a2(a+1)2+a(a+1)+a2=3a2+3a+1|x^2 + ax + a^2| \leq (|a|+1)^2 + |a|(|a|+1) + a^2 = 3a^2 + 3|a| + 1. Let M=3a2+3a+1M = 3a^2 + 3|a| + 1.

Choose δ=min(1,ε/M)\delta = \min(1, \varepsilon/M). Then xa<δ|x - a| \lt \delta implies:

x3a3xaM<εMM=ε|x^3 - a^3| \leq |x - a| \cdot M \lt \frac{\varepsilon}{M} \cdot M = \varepsilon

\blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 4.2 (Continuity), Section 4.7 (Worked Examples).

Problem 11. Prove that f(x)=xsin(1/x)f(x) = x \sin(1/x) (with f(0)=0f(0) = 0) is continuous on R\mathbb{R} but not Uniformly continuous on (0,1)(0, 1). (Trick question --- see solution.)

Solution

Solution. Continuity at 00: Given ε>0\varepsilon > 0Choose δ=ε\delta = \varepsilon. For x0=x<δ|x - 0| = |x| \lt \delta: f(x)f(0)=xsin(1/x)x<δ=ε|f(x) - f(0)| = |x \sin(1/x)| \leq |x| \lt \delta = \varepsilon. So ff is continuous at 00. For x0x \neq 0, ff is a product of continuous functions, hence continuous.

On uniform continuity: Actually, f(x)=xsin(1/x)f(x) = x\sin(1/x) is uniformly continuous on (0,1)(0, 1)! Here is why: ff extends continuously to [0,1][0, 1] (define f(0)=0f(0) = 0). By the Heine-Cantor theorem (Theorem 4.5), ff is uniformly continuous on [0,1][0, 1] And hence on the subset (0,1)(0, 1).

The function that is not uniformly continuous on (0,1)(0, 1) is g(x)=sin(1/x)g(x) = \sin(1/x)Which does not Extend continuously to 00. Or h(x)=1/xh(x) = 1/xWhich is unbounded. But f(x)=xsin(1/x)f(x) = x\sin(1/x) is bounded And has a continuous extension, so it is uniformly continuous. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 4.5 (Uniform Continuity), Section 4.6 (Heine-Cantor).

Problem 12. Prove that if f"(x)=g(x)f"(x) = g'(x) for all x(a,b)x \in (a, b) Then f(x)=g(x)+Cf(x) = g(x) + C for some Constant CC.

Solution

Solution. Let h(x)=f(x)g(x)h(x) = f(x) - g(x). Then h(x)=f(x)g(x)=0h'(x) = f'(x) - g'(x) = 0 for all x(a,b)x \in (a, b). By Corollary 5.4 (a consequence of the Mean Value Theorem), hh is constant on (a,b)(a, b). So f(x)g(x)=Cf(x) - g(x) = C for some CRC \in \mathbb{R}I.e., f(x)=g(x)+Cf(x) = g(x) + C. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 5.3 (Mean Value Theorem, Corollary 5.4).

Problem 13. Use Taylor’s theorem with remainder to bound the error in approximating e0.2e^{0.2} Using the fourth-degree Maclaurin polynomial.

Solution

Solution. The fourth-degree Maclaurin polynomial of exe^x is:

T4(x)=1+x+x22+x36+x424T_4(x) = 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{x^3}{6} + \frac{x^4}{24}

By Taylor’s theorem, R4(x)=eξ5!x5R_4(x) = \frac{e^{\xi}}{5!} x^5 for some ξ\xi between 00 and xx. For x=0.2x = 0.2: ξ(0,0.2)\xi \in (0, 0.2) So eξ<e0.2<e1/4<1.3e^{\xi} \lt e^{0.2} \lt e^{1/4} \lt 1.3.

R4(0.2)=eξ120(0.2)5<1.31200.00032=1.3×0.000321203.47×106|R_4(0.2)| = \frac{e^{\xi}}{120} (0.2)^5 \lt \frac{1.3}{120} \cdot 0.00032 = \frac{1.3 \times 0.00032}{120} \approx 3.47 \times 10^{-6}

So T4(0.2)=1+0.2+0.02+0.001333+0.000067=1.221400T_4(0.2) = 1 + 0.2 + 0.02 + 0.001333 + 0.000067 = 1.221400 approximates e0.2e^{0.2} with Error less than 3.5×1063.5 \times 10^{-6}. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 5.4 (Taylor’s Theorem), Section 5.7 (Worked Examples).

Problem 14. Compute 01x3dx\int_0^1 x^3\, dx from the definition using upper and lower Riemann sums.

Solution

Solution. Let Pn={0,1/n,2/n,,1}P_n = \{0, 1/n, 2/n, \ldots, 1\}. On [(i1)/n,i/n][(i-1)/n, i/n], f(x)=x3f(x) = x^3 has Mi=(i/n)3M_i = (i/n)^3 and mi=((i1)/n)3m_i = ((i-1)/n)^3.

U(f,Pn)=i=1ni3n31n=1n4i=1ni3=1n4n2(n+1)24U(f, P_n) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{i^3}{n^3} \cdot \frac{1}{n} = \frac{1}{n^4} \sum_{i=1}^{n} i^3 = \frac{1}{n^4} \cdot \frac{n^2(n+1)^2}{4}

As nn \to \infty:

limnU(f,Pn)=limn(n+1)24n2=14\lim_{n \to \infty} U(f, P_n) = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{(n+1)^2}{4n^2} = \frac{1}{4}

Similarly, L(f,Pn)1/4L(f, P_n) \to 1/4. So 01x3dx=1/4\int_0^1 x^3\, dx = 1/4. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 6.1 (Definition), Section 6.5 (Worked Examples).

Problem 14b. Show that the Dirichlet function f(x)={1xQ0xQf(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & x \in \mathbb{Q} \\ 0 & x \notin \mathbb{Q} \end{cases} is not Riemann integrable on [0,1][0, 1].

Solution

Solution. Every non-empty subinterval [xi1,xi][x_{i-1}, x_i] of any partition contains both rational and Irrational numbers (by density of Q\mathbb{Q} and density of RQ\mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}). So Mi=supf=1M_i = \sup f = 1 and mi=inff=0m_i = \inf f = 0 for every subinterval.

For any partition PP: U(f,P)=1Δxi=1U(f, P) = \sum 1 \cdot \Delta x_i = 1 and L(f,P)=0Δxi=0L(f, P) = \sum 0 \cdot \Delta x_i = 0. Hence 01f=10=01f\overline{\int_0^1} f = 1 \neq 0 = \underline{\int_0^1} f So ff is not Riemann integrable.

This also follows from Lebesgue’s criterion: ff is discontinuous everywhere, and [0,1][0,1] does not Have measure zero. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 6.2 (Integrability Criteria), Theorem 6.4b.

Problem 15. Evaluate 01x1x2dx\int_0^1 \frac{x}{\sqrt{1 - x^2}}\, dx as an improper integral.

Solution

Solution. The integrand f(x)=x/1x2f(x) = x/\sqrt{1 - x^2} is unbounded as x1x \to 1^-. This is a Type II Improper integral.

01x1x2dx=limb10bx1x2dx\int_0^1 \frac{x}{\sqrt{1 - x^2}}\, dx = \lim_{b \to 1^-} \int_0^b \frac{x}{\sqrt{1 - x^2}}\, dx

Compute via substitution u=1x2u = 1 - x^2, du=2xdxdu = -2x\, dx:

=limb1[1x2]0b=limb1(1b2+1)=0+1=1= \lim_{b \to 1^-} \left[-\sqrt{1 - x^2}\right]_0^b = \lim_{b \to 1^-} \left(-\sqrt{1 - b^2} + 1\right) = 0 + 1 = 1

The improper integral converges to 11. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 6.6 (Improper Integrals).

Problem 16. Let fn(x)=nx1+n2x2f_n(x) = \frac{nx}{1 + n^2 x^2} on (0,)(0, \infty). Find the pointwise limit and Determine whether the convergence is uniform on (0,)(0, \infty).

Solution

Solution. Pointwise limit: For fixed x>0x > 0: limnfn(x)=limnnx1+n2x2=limnx/n1/n2+x2=0\lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x) = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{nx}{1 + n^2 x^2} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{x/n}{1/n^2 + x^2} = 0.

So fn0f_n \to 0 pointwise on (0,)(0, \infty).

Uniform convergence? We check supx>0fn(x)0=supx>0nx1+n2x2\sup_{x > 0} |f_n(x) - 0| = \sup_{x > 0} \frac{nx}{1 + n^2 x^2}. To maximize, differentiate with respect to xx (treating nn as fixed):

ddx(nx1+n2x2)=n(1+n2x2)nx2n2x(1+n2x2)2=nn3x2(1+n2x2)2\frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{nx}{1 + n^2 x^2}\right) = \frac{n(1 + n^2 x^2) - nx \cdot 2n^2 x}{(1 + n^2 x^2)^2} = \frac{n - n^3 x^2}{(1 + n^2 x^2)^2}

Setting to zero: nn3x2=0n - n^3 x^2 = 0 So x=1/nx = 1/n. The maximum value is fn(1/n)=n1/n1+n2/n2=12f_n(1/n) = \frac{n \cdot 1/n}{1 + n^2/n^2} = \frac{1}{2}.

Since supx>0fn(x)=1/2\sup_{x > 0} |f_n(x)| = 1/2 for all nnThis does not tend to 00. Therefore the convergence Is not uniform on (0,)(0, \infty). \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 7.2 (Uniform Convergence), Section 7.1 (Pointwise Convergence).

Problem 17. Find the radius of convergence of n=1(2n)!(n!)2xn\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(2n)!}{(n!)^2} x^n.

Solution

Solution. Apply the ratio test to the terms:

an+1an=(2(n+1))!((n+1)!)2(n!)2(2n)!x=(2n+2)(2n+1)(n+1)2x\left|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right| = \frac{(2(n+1))!}{((n+1)!)^2} \cdot \frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!} \cdot |x| = \frac{(2n+2)(2n+1)}{(n+1)^2} \cdot |x|

=2(2n+1)n+1x=4n+2n+1x4xas n= \frac{2(2n+1)}{n+1} \cdot |x| = \frac{4n + 2}{n + 1} \cdot |x| \to 4|x| \quad \mathrm{as\ } n \to \infty

The series converges when 4x<14|x| \lt 1I.e., x<1/4|x| \lt 1/4 And diverges when 4x>14|x| > 1. The radius of convergence is R=1/4R = 1/4. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 7.7 (Power Series), Section 3.2 (Ratio Test).

Problem 18. Let fn(x)=xn/nf_n(x) = x^n/n on [0,1][0, 1]. Show that fn0f_n \to 0 uniformly, but fn(x)=xn1f_n'(x) = x^{n-1} does not converge uniformly on (0,1)(0, 1).

Solution

Solution. Uniform convergence of fnf_n: supx[0,1]xn/n=1/n0\sup_{x \in [0,1]} |x^n/n| = 1/n \to 0 as nn \to \infty. So fn0f_n \to 0 uniformly on [0,1][0, 1].

Non-uniform convergence of fnf_n': fn(x)=xn1f_n'(x) = x^{n-1}. The pointwise limit is g(x)=0g(x) = 0 for 0x<10 \leq x \lt 1 and g(1)=1g(1) = 1. So supx[0,1]fn(x)g(x)fn(1)g(1)=11=0\sup_{x \in [0,1]} |f_n'(x) - g(x)| \geq |f_n'(1) - g(1)| = |1 - 1| = 0.

Actually, check supx[0,1)xn1=1\sup_{x \in [0,1)} |x^{n-1}| = 1 (approached as x1x \to 1^-). But g(x)=0g(x) = 0 on [0,1)[0, 1) So supx[0,1)xn10=1\sup_{x \in [0,1)} |x^{n-1} - 0| = 1 for all nn. This does not Tend to 00 So fnf_n' does not converge uniformly on [0,1)[0, 1).

This illustrates that uniform convergence of functions does not imply uniform convergence of Derivatives, which is why Theorem 7.4 requires the stronger hypothesis of uniform convergence of (fn)(f_n'). \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 7.2 (Uniform Convergence), Section 7.6 (Uniform Convergence and Differentiation).

Problem 19. Let fn(x)=x1+nx2f_n(x) = \frac{x}{1 + nx^2} on [0,)[0, \infty). Find the pointwise limit and determine Whether the convergence is uniform.

Solution

Solution. Pointwise limit: For x=0x = 0: fn(0)=0f_n(0) = 0 for all nn. For x>0x > 0: limnx1+nx2=limn11/x+nx=0\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{x}{1 + nx^2} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{1/x + nx} = 0. So fn0f_n \to 0 pointwise.

Uniform convergence on [0,)[0, \infty)? We check supx0fn(x)\sup_{x \geq 0} |f_n(x)|. Differentiate: ddx(x1+nx2)=1nx2(1+nx2)2\frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{x}{1 + nx^2}\right) = \frac{1 - nx^2}{(1 + nx^2)^2}. Setting to zero: x=1/nx = 1/\sqrt{n}. The maximum value is fn(1/n)=1/n1+n/n=12nf_n(1/\sqrt{n}) = \frac{1/\sqrt{n}}{1 + n/n} = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{n}}.

Since supx0fn(x)=12n0\sup_{x \geq 0} |f_n(x)| = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{n}} \to 0 as nn \to \inftyThe convergence is Uniform on [0,)[0, \infty). \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 7.2 (Uniform Convergence).

Problem 20. Prove that the series n=0(1)n2n+1x2n+1\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{2n+1} x^{2n+1} converges uniformly on [1,1][-1, 1] and identify its sum.

Solution

Solution. For x1|x| \leq 1: (1)nx2n+12n+112n+1\left|\frac{(-1)^n x^{2n+1}}{2n+1}\right| \leq \frac{1}{2n+1}. The series 12n+1\sum \frac{1}{2n+1} diverges (it dominates half the harmonic series), so the Weierstrass M-test does not apply directly with these bounds.

However, by the alternating series test, the series converges pointwise for every x1|x| \leq 1 (since x2n+12n+1\frac{|x|^{2n+1}}{2n+1} decreases to 00 for x1|x| \leq 1). The sum is arctanx\arctan x Which is the Taylor series of arctan\arctan about 00.

For uniform convergence, we use Abel’s test for uniform convergence of series: if fn(x)\sum f_n(x) has uniformly bounded partial sums and gn(x)g_n(x) decreases uniformly to 00 Then fn(x)gn(x)\sum f_n(x) g_n(x) converges uniformly. Here fn(x)=(1)nx2n+1f_n(x) = (-1)^n x^{2n+1} and gn(x)=1/(2n+1)g_n(x) = 1/(2n+1) Is independent of xx.

The partial sums k=0n(1)kx2k+1=x1(x2)n+11+x22x1+x21\left|\sum_{k=0}^{n} (-1)^k x^{2k+1}\right| = \frac{|x| \cdot |1-(-x^2)^{n+1}|}{1+x^2} \leq \frac{2|x|}{1+x^2} \leq 1 for x1|x| \leq 1 (geometric series with closed form). And 1/(2n+1)01/(2n+1) \to 0 uniformly. By Abel’s test, the convergence is uniform on [1,1][-1, 1].

Setting x=1x = 1: n=0(1)n2n+1=arctan1=π/4\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{2n+1} = \arctan 1 = \pi/4. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Section 7.3 (Weierstrass M-Test), Section 7.7 (Power Series), Abel’s theorem.

Real analysis is the rigorous foundation of calculus. Where calculus asks “what is the derivative,” analysis asks “what does it mean for a derivative to exist, and when can we be sure it does.” The epsilon-delta definition replaces geometric intuition with logical precision: limits, continuity, and convergence are all statements about how close you can force outputs to be by constraining inputs. The supremum formalises “least upper bound” without requiring the bound to be attained. Uniform convergence means the approximation works simultaneously across all points, not just point by point.

  • Assuming every bounded set has a maximum. A set can be bounded above without having a maximum; the supremum always exists but may not be a member of the set. Fix: The supremum sup(S)\sup(S) is the least upper bound; it equals the maximum only when sup(S)S\sup(S) \in S.
  • Misusing the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta definition. The order of quantifiers matters: “for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, there exists δ>0\delta > 0” — δ\delta depends on ε\varepsilon and the point, not the other way around. Fix: In proofs, choose δ\delta after ε\varepsilon is given; δ\delta depends on both ε\varepsilon and x0x_0 (unless the function is uniformly continuous).
  • Confusing pointwise and uniform convergence. Pointwise: δ\delta may depend on xx. Uniform: δ\delta works for all xx simultaneously. Fix: Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence but not conversely; the Weierstrass M-test gives a sufficient condition for uniform convergence.

Example 1: Proving a limit using ε\varepsilon-δ\delta

Section titled “Example 1: Proving a limit using ε\varepsilonε-δ\deltaδ”

Problem. Prove that limx2(3x1)=5\lim_{x \to 2} (3x - 1) = 5.

Solution. Let ε>0\varepsilon > 0 be given. We need 3x15<ε|3x - 1 - 5| < \varepsilon, i.e. 3x6<ε|3x - 6| < \varepsilon, i.e. 3x2<ε3|x - 2| < \varepsilon.

Choose δ=ε/3\delta = \varepsilon/3. Then x2<δ|x - 2| < \delta implies 3x2<3ε/3=ε3|x - 2| < 3 \cdot \varepsilon/3 = \varepsilon.

Therefore limx2(3x1)=5\lim_{x \to 2}(3x - 1) = 5. \blacksquare

Problem. Find sup\sup and inf\inf of the set S={1/n:nN}S = \{1/n : n \in \mathbb{N}\}.

Solution. The elements are 1,1/2,1/3,1, 1/2, 1/3, \ldots. The sequence decreases and approaches 00.

sup(S)=1S\sup(S) = 1 \in S (this is also the maximum). inf(S)=0S\inf(S) = 0 \notin S.

\blacksquare

flowchart TD
A[8_Problem Set] --> B[Key Concepts]
A --> C[Core Principles]
A --> D[Practical Applications]
B --> E[Fundamental definitions]
C --> F[Design patterns]
D --> G[Real-world usage]
  • R\mathbb{R} is a complete ordered field; the completeness axiom guarantees sup(S)\sup(S) exists for every non-empty bounded-above set.
  • Supremum sup(S)\sup(S) is the least upper bound; it equals max(S)\max(S) iff sup(S)S\sup(S) \in S.
  • ε\varepsilon-δ\delta definition: limxaf(x)=L\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L iff for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there exists δ>0\delta > 0 such that 0<xa<δ0 < |x-a| < \delta implies f(x)L<ε|f(x) - L| < \varepsilon.
  • Uniform convergence preserves continuity, differentiability (under appropriate conditions), and integrability.
TopicSiteLink
Real Analysis (Overview)WyattsNotesView
Complex AnalysisWyattsNotesView
Multivariable CalculusWyattsNotesView
Differential EquationsWyattsNotesView
Real Analysis — MIT 18.100MIT OCWView