Problem 1. Let A,B⊆R be non-empty and bounded above. Prove that sup(A∪B)=max(supA,supB).
Solution
Solution. Let M=max(supA,supB). Without loss, assume supA≥supB So M=supA. For all x∈A∪B: either x∈A So x≤supA=M; or x∈B So x≤supB≤M. Thus M is an upper bound for A∪B.
For the least property: since M=supA and A⊆A∪BEvery upper bound of A∪B Is an upper bound of AHence ≥supA=M. Therefore sup(A∪B)=M. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 1.3 (Supremum and Infimum), Section 1.5 (Properties).
Problem 2. Prove that infA=−sup(−A) for any non-empty bounded set A⊆R.
Solution
Solution. Let u=sup(−A). For all a∈A: −a∈−A So −a≤uGiving a≥−u. Thus −u is a lower bound for A. If v is any lower bound for A Then −v is an upper bound for −A So u≤−vI.e., −u≥v. Hence −u is the greatest lower bound, so infA=−u=−sup(−A). ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 1.5 (Properties of Supremum and Infimum).
Problem 3. Using the ε-N definition, prove that limn→∞2n2+1n2+3n=21.
We need 2n3<εI.e., n>3/(2ε). Choose N=⌈3/(2ε)⌉. For n≥N: the expression is <ε. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 2.1 (Convergence), Section 2.7 (Worked Examples).
Problem 4. Let a1=1 and an+1=21(an+an2). Prove (an) converges And find its limit.
Solution
Solution.Step 1:(an) is bounded below by 2. By AM-GM: an+1=21(an+2/an)≥an⋅2/an=2.
Step 2:(an) is decreasing for n≥2. Note a1=1, a2=3/2. an+1−an=21(an+2/an)−an=21(2/an−an)=2an2−an2. Since an≥2 for n≥2, an2≥2 So an+1−an≤0.
Step 3: By the Monotone Convergence Theorem, L=liman exists. Taking limits: L=21(L+2/L)Giving 2L=L+2/L So L=2/LHence L2=2. Since an≥2 for n≥2, L≥0 So L=2. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 2.2 (Monotone Convergence Theorem), Section 2.7 (recursive sequences).
Problem 5. Compute limsupn→∞an and liminfn→∞an for an=2+(−1)nn+1n.
Solution
Solution. Write an=2+(−1)n⋅n+1n.
For even n=2k: a2k=2+2k+12k→2+1=3. For odd n=2k−1: a2k−1=2−2k2k−1→2−1=1.
Since these are the only two subsequential limits: limsupan=3 and liminfan=1. The sequence diverges since limsup=liminf. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 2.6 (Limit Superior and Limit Inferior).
Problem 6. Determine whether ∑n=2∞n(lnn)21 converges.
Solution
Solution. Apply the integral test with f(x)=1/(x(lnx)2) on [2,∞). The function is Positive, continuous, and decreasing. Compute via u=lnx, du=dx/x:
∫2∞x(lnx)21dx=∫ln2∞u21du=[−u1]ln2∞=ln21<∞
The integral converges, so by the integral test, the series converges. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 3.2 (Integral Test), Section 3.6 (Worked Examples).
Problem 7. Does ∑n=1∞n1/3(−1)n+1 converge absolutely, conditionally, or diverge?
Solution
Solution. The absolute series is ∑1/n1/3Which is a p-series with p=1/3<1 So it diverges. Hence the series does not converge absolutely.
For conditional convergence, apply the alternating series test: an=1/n1/3 is positive, Decreasing, and an→0. Therefore ∑(−1)n+1/n1/3 converges.
Since it converges but not absolutely, it converges conditionally. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 3.3 (Absolute and Conditional Convergence), Section 3.6 (Alternating Series Test).
Problem 8. Find the sum of ∑n=1∞n(n+2)1.
Solution
Solution. Use partial fractions: n(n+2)1=21(n1−n+21). The N-th partial sum telescopes:
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 3.1 (Definitions and Convergence), telescoping series.
Problem 9. Give an explicit rearrangement of ∑n=1∞n(−1)n+1 whose sum is 0.
Solution
Solution. By the Riemann Rearrangement Theorem, such a rearrangement exists. We construct it Explicitly. The positive terms are 1,1/3,1/5,… and the negative terms are −1/2,−1/4,−1/6,….
Start: S1=1. Then add negative terms until we go below 0: S2=1−1/2=1/2>0. S3=1−1/2−1/4=1/4>0. S4=1−1/2−1/4−1/6=−1/12<0.
Then add positive terms until we exceed 0: S5=−1/12+1/3=1/4>0.
Then add negative terms until below 0: S6=1/4−1/8=1/8>0. S7=1/8−1/10=1/40>0. S8=1/40−1/12=−7/120<0.
Continue this process. Since ∑1/(2k−1)=∞ and ∑1/(2k)=∞We can always Continue. Since 1/n→0The oscillations shrink to 0. The resulting rearrangement converges to 0. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 3.5 (Rearrangement of Series).
Problem 10. Prove using ε-δ that f(x)=x3 is continuous at every a∈R.
Solution
Solution. Let a∈R and ε>0. Compute:
∣f(x)−f(a)∣=∣x3−a3∣=∣x−a∣⋅∣x2+ax+a2∣
Restrict to ∣x−a∣<1 So ∣x∣<∣a∣+1Giving ∣x2+ax+a2∣≤(∣a∣+1)2+∣a∣(∣a∣+1)+a2=3a2+3∣a∣+1. Let M=3a2+3∣a∣+1.
Choose δ=min(1,ε/M). Then ∣x−a∣<δ implies:
∣x3−a3∣≤∣x−a∣⋅M<Mε⋅M=ε
■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 4.2 (Continuity), Section 4.7 (Worked Examples).
Problem 11. Prove that f(x)=xsin(1/x) (with f(0)=0) is continuous on R but not Uniformly continuous on (0,1). (Trick question --- see solution.)
Solution
Solution.Continuity at 0: Given ε>0Choose δ=ε. For ∣x−0∣=∣x∣<δ: ∣f(x)−f(0)∣=∣xsin(1/x)∣≤∣x∣<δ=ε. So f is continuous at 0. For x=0, f is a product of continuous functions, hence continuous.
On uniform continuity: Actually, f(x)=xsin(1/x)is uniformly continuous on (0,1)! Here is why: f extends continuously to [0,1] (define f(0)=0). By the Heine-Cantor theorem (Theorem 4.5), f is uniformly continuous on [0,1] And hence on the subset (0,1).
The function that is not uniformly continuous on (0,1) is g(x)=sin(1/x)Which does not Extend continuously to 0. Or h(x)=1/xWhich is unbounded. But f(x)=xsin(1/x) is bounded And has a continuous extension, so it is uniformly continuous. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 4.5 (Uniform Continuity), Section 4.6 (Heine-Cantor).
Problem 12. Prove that if f"(x)=g′(x) for all x∈(a,b) Then f(x)=g(x)+C for some Constant C.
Solution
Solution. Let h(x)=f(x)−g(x). Then h′(x)=f′(x)−g′(x)=0 for all x∈(a,b). By Corollary 5.4 (a consequence of the Mean Value Theorem), h is constant on (a,b). So f(x)−g(x)=C for some C∈RI.e., f(x)=g(x)+C. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 5.3 (Mean Value Theorem, Corollary 5.4).
Problem 13. Use Taylor’s theorem with remainder to bound the error in approximating e0.2 Using the fourth-degree Maclaurin polynomial.
Solution
Solution. The fourth-degree Maclaurin polynomial of ex is:
T4(x)=1+x+2x2+6x3+24x4
By Taylor’s theorem, R4(x)=5!eξx5 for some ξ between 0 and x. For x=0.2: ξ∈(0,0.2) So eξ<e0.2<e1/4<1.3.
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 6.1 (Definition), Section 6.5 (Worked Examples).
Problem 14b. Show that the Dirichlet function f(x)={10x∈Qx∈/Q is not Riemann integrable on [0,1].
Solution
Solution. Every non-empty subinterval [xi−1,xi] of any partition contains both rational and Irrational numbers (by density of Q and density of R∖Q). So Mi=supf=1 and mi=inff=0 for every subinterval.
For any partition P: U(f,P)=∑1⋅Δxi=1 and L(f,P)=∑0⋅Δxi=0. Hence ∫01f=1=0=∫01f So f is not Riemann integrable.
This also follows from Lebesgue’s criterion: f is discontinuous everywhere, and [0,1] does not Have measure zero. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 6.2 (Integrability Criteria), Theorem 6.4b.
Problem 15. Evaluate ∫011−x2xdx as an improper integral.
Solution
Solution. The integrand f(x)=x/1−x2 is unbounded as x→1−. This is a Type II Improper integral.
∫011−x2xdx=limb→1−∫0b1−x2xdx
Compute via substitution u=1−x2, du=−2xdx:
=limb→1−[−1−x2]0b=limb→1−(−1−b2+1)=0+1=1
The improper integral converges to 1. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 6.6 (Improper Integrals).
Problem 16. Let fn(x)=1+n2x2nx on (0,∞). Find the pointwise limit and Determine whether the convergence is uniform on (0,∞).
Solution
Solution.Pointwise limit: For fixed x>0: limn→∞fn(x)=limn→∞1+n2x2nx=limn→∞1/n2+x2x/n=0.
So fn→0 pointwise on (0,∞).
Uniform convergence? We check supx>0∣fn(x)−0∣=supx>01+n2x2nx. To maximize, differentiate with respect to x (treating n as fixed):
The series converges when 4∣x∣<1I.e., ∣x∣<1/4 And diverges when 4∣x∣>1. The radius of convergence is R=1/4. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 7.7 (Power Series), Section 3.2 (Ratio Test).
Problem 18. Let fn(x)=xn/n on [0,1]. Show that fn→0 uniformly, but fn′(x)=xn−1 does not converge uniformly on (0,1).
Solution
Solution.Uniform convergence of fn:supx∈[0,1]∣xn/n∣=1/n→0 as n→∞. So fn→0 uniformly on [0,1].
Non-uniform convergence of fn′:fn′(x)=xn−1. The pointwise limit is g(x)=0 for 0≤x<1 and g(1)=1. So supx∈[0,1]∣fn′(x)−g(x)∣≥∣fn′(1)−g(1)∣=∣1−1∣=0.
Actually, check supx∈[0,1)∣xn−1∣=1 (approached as x→1−). But g(x)=0 on [0,1) So supx∈[0,1)∣xn−1−0∣=1 for all n. This does not Tend to 0 So fn′ does not converge uniformly on [0,1).
This illustrates that uniform convergence of functions does not imply uniform convergence of Derivatives, which is why Theorem 7.4 requires the stronger hypothesis of uniform convergence of (fn′). ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 7.2 (Uniform Convergence), Section 7.6 (Uniform Convergence and Differentiation).
Problem 19. Let fn(x)=1+nx2x on [0,∞). Find the pointwise limit and determine Whether the convergence is uniform.
Solution
Solution.Pointwise limit: For x=0: fn(0)=0 for all n. For x>0: limn→∞1+nx2x=limn→∞1/x+nx1=0. So fn→0 pointwise.
Uniform convergence on [0,∞)? We check supx≥0∣fn(x)∣. Differentiate: dxd(1+nx2x)=(1+nx2)21−nx2. Setting to zero: x=1/n. The maximum value is fn(1/n)=1+n/n1/n=2n1.
Since supx≥0∣fn(x)∣=2n1→0 as n→∞The convergence is Uniform on [0,∞). ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 7.2 (Uniform Convergence).
Problem 20. Prove that the series ∑n=0∞2n+1(−1)nx2n+1 converges uniformly on [−1,1] and identify its sum.
Solution
Solution. For ∣x∣≤1: 2n+1(−1)nx2n+1≤2n+11. The series ∑2n+11 diverges (it dominates half the harmonic series), so the Weierstrass M-test does not apply directly with these bounds.
However, by the alternating series test, the series converges pointwise for every ∣x∣≤1 (since 2n+1∣x∣2n+1 decreases to 0 for ∣x∣≤1). The sum is arctanx Which is the Taylor series of arctan about 0.
For uniform convergence, we use Abel’s test for uniform convergence of series: if ∑fn(x) has uniformly bounded partial sums and gn(x) decreases uniformly to 0 Then ∑fn(x)gn(x) converges uniformly. Here fn(x)=(−1)nx2n+1 and gn(x)=1/(2n+1) Is independent of x.
The partial sums ∑k=0n(−1)kx2k+1=1+x2∣x∣⋅∣1−(−x2)n+1∣≤1+x22∣x∣≤1 for ∣x∣≤1 (geometric series with closed form). And 1/(2n+1)→0 uniformly. By Abel’s test, the convergence is uniform on [−1,1].
Setting x=1: ∑n=0∞2n+1(−1)n=arctan1=π/4. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 7.3 (Weierstrass M-Test), Section 7.7 (Power Series), Abel’s theorem.
Real analysis is the rigorous foundation of calculus. Where calculus asks “what is the derivative,” analysis asks “what does it mean for a derivative to exist, and when can we be sure it does.” The epsilon-delta definition replaces geometric intuition with logical precision: limits, continuity, and convergence are all statements about how close you can force outputs to be by constraining inputs. The supremum formalises “least upper bound” without requiring the bound to be attained. Uniform convergence means the approximation works simultaneously across all points, not just point by point.
Assuming every bounded set has a maximum. A set can be bounded above without having a maximum; the supremum always exists but may not be a member of the set. Fix: The supremum sup(S) is the least upper bound; it equals the maximum only when sup(S)∈S.
Misusing the ε-δ definition. The order of quantifiers matters: “for every ε>0, there exists δ>0” — δ depends on ε and the point, not the other way around. Fix: In proofs, choose δ after ε is given; δ depends on both ε and x0 (unless the function is uniformly continuous).
Confusing pointwise and uniform convergence. Pointwise: δ may depend on x. Uniform: δ works for all x simultaneously. Fix: Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence but not conversely; the Weierstrass M-test gives a sufficient condition for uniform convergence.