Skip to content

Cauchy's Theorem | Mathematics

Theorem 5.1 (Cauchy”s Theorem). If ff is analytic on a connected domain DD and γ\gamma Is a simple closed contour in DD Then

γf(z)dz=0\int_\gamma f(z)\, dz = 0

Proof (for ff' continuous). By Green’s theorem in the plane, writing f=u+ivf = u + iv:

γfdz=γ(udxvdy)+iγ(vdx+udy)\int_\gamma f\, dz = \int_\gamma (u\, dx - v\, dy) + i\int_\gamma (v\, dx + u\, dy)

Applying Green’s theorem to each integral:

=D(vxuy)dA+iD(uxvy)dA=0= \iint_D (-v_x - u_y)\, dA + i\iint_D (u_x - v_y)\, dA = 0

By the Cauchy-Riemann equations. \blacksquare

A domain DCD \subseteq \mathbb{C} is connected if every simple closed contour in DD can Be continuously shrunk to a point within DD.

Cauchy’s theorem may fail on multiply connected domains. For example, γ1zdz=2πi\int_\gamma \frac{1}{z}\, dz = 2\pi i where γ\gamma is the unit circle (traversing a region that Excludes the singularity at z=0z = 0).

Corollary 5.2. If ff is analytic on a connected domain DD Then the integral z0z1f(z)dz\int_{z_0}^{z_1} f(z)\, dz is independent of the path from z0z_0 to z1z_1 in DD.

Theorem 5.3. If ff is analytic on a connected domain DD Then ff has an antiderivative FF in DD (i.e., F(z)=f(z)F'(z) = f(z)), and

γf(z)dz=F(z1)F(z0)\int_\gamma f(z)\, dz = F(z_1) - F(z_0)

Where z0z_0 and z1z_1 are the endpoints of γ\gamma.

5.5 Cauchy’s Theorem for Multiply Connected Domains

Section titled “5.5 Cauchy’s Theorem for Multiply Connected Domains”

Theorem 5.4. If ff is analytic on a domain DD containing simple closed contours γ,γ1,,γn\gamma, \gamma_1, \ldots, \gamma_n where γ1,,γn\gamma_1, \ldots, \gamma_n Lie in the interior of γ\gamma and the region between γ\gamma and the γk\gamma_k is contained in DD And all contours are positively oriented, then

γf(z)dz=k=1nγkf(z)dz\int_\gamma f(z)\, dz = \sum_{k=1}^n \int_{\gamma_k} f(z)\, dz

Theorem 5.5 (Deformation of Contours). If ff is analytic on a domain containing two simple Closed contours γ1\gamma_1 and γ2\gamma_2 where one can be continuously deformed into the other Within the domain of analyticity of ff Then

γ1f(z)dz=γ2f(z)dz\int_{\gamma_1} f(z)\, dz = \int_{\gamma_2} f(z)\, dz

Proof. This follows directly from Theorem 5.4 applied to the region between γ1\gamma_1 and γ2\gamma_2. \blacksquare

Remark. This theorem is enormously useful: we can replace a complicated contour with a simpler one (a small circle around each singularity) without changing the value of the integral.

Solution

Problem. Evaluate γdzz2\int_\gamma \frac{dz}{z - 2} where γ\gamma is the ellipse x24+y29=1\frac{x^2}{4} + \frac{y^2}{9} = 1.

Since z=2z = 2 is inside the ellipse and 1z2\frac{1}{z - 2} is analytic everywhere else, By deformation of contours we can replace γ\gamma with a small circle around z=2z = 2:

γdzz2=2πi\int_\gamma \frac{dz}{z - 2} = 2\pi i.

Problem. Evaluate γezzdz\int_\gamma \frac{e^z}{z}\, dz where γ\gamma is the square with vertices ±2±2i\pm 2 \pm 2i.

ezz\frac{e^z}{z} is analytic on and inside γ\gamma except at z=0z = 0. By deformation: γezzdz=z=rezzdz=2πie0=2πi\int_\gamma \frac{e^z}{z}\, dz = \int_{|z|=r} \frac{e^z}{z}\, dz = 2\pi i \cdot e^0 = 2\pi i.

Problem. Evaluate γdzz21\int_\gamma \frac{dz}{z^2 - 1} where γ\gamma is z=2|z| = 2.

1z21=12(1z11z+1)\frac{1}{z^2 - 1} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{z-1} - \frac{1}{z+1}\right).

Both z=±1z = \pm 1 are inside z=2|z| = 2.

γdzz21=12(2πi2πi)=0\int_\gamma \frac{dz}{z^2 - 1} = \frac{1}{2}(2\pi i - 2\pi i) = 0.

  • Assuming Cauchy’s theorem applies to any closed contour: The theorem requires ff to be analytic on a directly connected domain containing the contour. If the contour encloses any singularity, the integral may be non-zero.
  • Confusing directly connected with connected: A domain can be connected but not directly connected (e.g., an annulus). Cauchy’s theorem fails on such domains without additional conditions on the contour.
  • Applying the deformation theorem outside the domain of analyticity: The contour can only be deformed through regions where ff remains analytic. Deforming a contour across a singularity changes the value of the integral.
  • Forgetting orientation when using the multiply connected theorem: The outer contour and inner contours must be traversed with consistent positive orientation (counterclockwise for the outer, clockwise for the inner) for the equality γf=γkf\int_\gamma f = \sum \int_{\gamma_k} f to hold.

Problem. Evaluate I=02πdθ2+cosθI = \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{d\theta}{2 + \cos\theta}.

Solution. Let z=eiθz = e^{i\theta}, so dθ=dz/(iz)d\theta = dz/(iz) and cosθ=(z+z1)/2\cos\theta = (z + z^{-1})/2.

I=z=112+(z+z1)/2dziz=z=124z+z2+1dzi=2iz=1dzz2+4z+1I = \oint_{|z|=1} \frac{1}{2 + (z + z^{-1})/2} \cdot \frac{dz}{iz} = \oint_{|z|=1} \frac{2}{4z + z^2 + 1} \cdot \frac{dz}{i} = \frac{2}{i} \oint_{|z|=1} \frac{dz}{z^2 + 4z + 1}

The denominator factors as (z+23)(z+2+3)(z + 2 - \sqrt{3})(z + 2 + \sqrt{3}). Only the root z=2+3z = -2 + \sqrt{3} lies inside z=1|z| = 1. By Cauchy’s theorem applied to the directly connected region after deformation:

I=2i2πiResz=2+31z2+4z+1=4π123=2π3I = \frac{2}{i} \cdot 2\pi i \cdot \operatorname{Res}_{z=-2+\sqrt{3}} \frac{1}{z^2 + 4z + 1} = 4\pi \cdot \frac{1}{2\sqrt{3}} = \frac{2\pi}{\sqrt{3}}

Problem. Evaluate 0xx2+1dx\int_0^\infty \frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^2 + 1}\,dx.

Solution. Consider f(z)=zz2+1f(z) = \frac{\sqrt{z}}{z^2 + 1} with a branch cut along the positive real axis. Integrate around a keyhole contour γ\gamma consisting of CRC_R (large circle radius RR), CεC_\varepsilon (small circle radius ε\varepsilon), and two straight segments just above and below the cut. On the upper segment, z=x\sqrt{z} = \sqrt{x}; on the lower segment, z=x\sqrt{z} = -\sqrt{x} (due to the 2π2\pi phase change). By Cauchy’s theorem:

γf(z)dz=2πi(Resz=if(z)+Resz=if(z))\int_\gamma f(z)\,dz = 2\pi i \left(\operatorname{Res}_{z=i} f(z) + \operatorname{Res}_{z=-i} f(z)\right)

As RR \to \infty and ε0\varepsilon \to 0, the circular contributions vanish, leaving:

20xx2+1dx=2πi(i2i+i2i)=π22\int_0^\infty \frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^2 + 1}\,dx = 2\pi i \left(\frac{\sqrt{i}}{2i} + \frac{\sqrt{-i}}{-2i}\right) = \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{2}}

Hence 0xx2+1dx=π2\int_0^\infty \frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^2 + 1}\,dx = \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{2}}.

  • Cauchy’s theorem requires analyticity on the entire region enclosed by the contour. If ff has even a single singularity inside γ\gamma, the integral may be nonzero.
  • The integral over a closed contour equals 2πi2\pi i times the sum of residues (a consequence of Cauchy’s theorem for multiply connected domains), connecting Cauchy’s theorem to the residue calculus.
  • Path independence is equivalent to the existence of an antiderivative on a directly connected domain, which in turn is guaranteed by Cauchy’s theorem.
  • Deformation of contours allows replacing complicated paths with simple ones (e.g., small circles around singularities) without changing the integral value.
  • The Cauchy-Riemann equations are both necessary and sufficient for the proof: the vanishing of the double integral in the proof relies entirely on ux=vyu_x = v_y and uy=vxu_y = -v_x.
  • Evaluating real integrals: Many difficult real integrals (e.g., 0cosxx2+1dx\int_0^\infty \frac{\cos x}{x^2+1}\,dx) are computed by choosing appropriate contours and applying Cauchy’s theorem.
  • Computing residues: The residue theorem, which follows from Cauchy’s theorem, is the standard tool for evaluating contour integrals in physics and engineering.
  • Conformal mapping: Cauchy’s theorem underpins the theory of conformal maps, used in fluid dynamics and electrostatics to solve boundary value problems.
  • Signal processing: The Laplace and Fourier transforms rely on contour integration techniques derived from Cauchy’s theorem.
  • Number theory: Contour integrals related to the Riemann zeta function use Cauchy’s theorem to establish properties of prime number distribution.
flowchart TD
A[5_Cauchy S Theorem] --> B[Key Concepts]
A --> C[Core Principles]
A --> D[Practical Applications]
B --> E[Fundamental definitions]
C --> F[Design patterns]
D --> G[Real-world usage]

Cauchy’s theorem says the integral of an analytic function around a closed contour is zero, provided the function is analytic everywhere inside. This is the complex analogue of a conservative force field in physics: going in a circle returns you to the same potential. The intuition is that analytic functions have no sources or sinks inside the domain, so there is nothing to create a net circulation. Deforming the contour does not change the integral as long as you avoid singularities. This theorem is the foundation for the residue theorem and the entire edifice of complex integration.

This section provides detailed coverage of advanced concepts, including full derivations, proofs, and extended examples.

Complete mathematical derivations and proofs are provided where appropriate. Each step is explained to ensure understanding of the underlying reasoning.

Advanced examples demonstrate the application of concepts to complex problems. These examples go beyond standard exam questions to develop deeper understanding.

This material connects to current research and advanced applications in the field. Understanding these connections provides context for the study material.

Ensure you have mastered the prerequisite material before attempting this advanced content.