Skip to content

Singularities and Residue Theory

Let z0z_0 be an isolated singularity of ff (i.e., ff is analytic in a punctured neighbourhood of z0z_0).

Classification by Laurent series:

  1. Removable singularity: an=0a_n = 0 for all n<0n \lt 0. Can be removed by redefining f(z0)=a0f(z_0) = a_0.
  2. Pole of order mm: am0a_{-m} \neq 0 and an=0a_n = 0 for n<mn \lt -m. The principal part is finite.
  3. Essential singularity: infinitely many non-zero ana_n with n<0n \lt 0.

Proposition 8.1 (Riemann”s Removable Singularity Theorem). If ff is bounded near z0z_0 Then z0z_0 is a removable singularity.

Proposition 8.2. z0z_0 is a pole of order mm if and only if limzz0(zz0)mf(z)\lim_{z \to z_0} (z - z_0)^m f(z) Exists and is non-zero.

Theorem 8.3 (Casorati-Weierstrass). If z0z_0 is an essential singularity of ff Then ff takes Values arbitrarily close to any complex number in every neighbourhood of z0z_0.

Solution

Problem. Classify the singularities of f(z)=sinzzf(z) = \frac{\sin z}{z}.

z=0z = 0: sinz=zz3/6+\sin z = z - z^3/6 + \cdots So f(z)=1z2/6+f(z) = 1 - z^2/6 + \cdots. No negative powers, so z=0z = 0 is a removable singularity. f(0)=1f(0) = 1 by continuity.

Problem. Classify the singularities of f(z)=ez1z2f(z) = \frac{e^z - 1}{z^2}.

z=0z = 0: ez1=z+z2/2+e^z - 1 = z + z^2/2 + \cdots So f(z)=1z+12+f(z) = \frac{1}{z} + \frac{1}{2} + \cdots. Principal part is 1/z1/z So z=0z = 0 is a simple pole with residue 11.

Problem. Classify the singularity of f(z)=e1/zf(z) = e^{1/z} at z=0z = 0.

e1/z=n=01n!zn=1+1z+12z2+e^{1/z} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n!\, z^n} = 1 + \frac{1}{z} + \frac{1}{2z^2} + \cdots

Infinitely many negative powers \Rightarrow z=0z = 0 is an essential singularity.

Problem. Classify the singularities of f(z)=z+1z3(z2+1)f(z) = \frac{z + 1}{z^3(z^2 + 1)}.

z=0z = 0: pole of order 33. z=iz = i: simple pole. z=iz = -i: simple pole.

Problem. Determine the type of singularity of f(z)=zsinzf(z) = \frac{z}{\sin z} at z=0z = 0.

sinz=zz3/6+\sin z = z - z^3/6 + \cdots So f(z)=11z2/6+=1+z26+f(z) = \frac{1}{1 - z^2/6 + \cdots} = 1 + \frac{z^2}{6} + \cdots.

No negative powers, so z=0z = 0 is a removable singularity with f(0)=1f(0) = 1.

Definition. The residue of ff at an isolated singularity z0z_0 is the coefficient a1a_{-1} In the Laurent expansion:

Res(f,z0)=a1=12πiγf(z)dz\mathrm{Res}(f, z_0) = a_{-1} = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_\gamma f(z)\, dz

Where γ\gamma is a small positively oriented circle around z0z_0.

For a simple pole at z0z_0:

Res(f,z0)=limzz0(zz0)f(z)\mathrm{Res}(f, z_0) = \lim_{z \to z_0} (z - z_0)f(z)

If f=g/hf = g/h where g(z0)0g(z_0) \neq 0, h(z0)=0h(z_0) = 0, h(z0)0h'(z_0) \neq 0:

Res(f,z0)=g(z0)h(z0)\mathrm{Res}(f, z_0) = \frac{g(z_0)}{h'(z_0)}

For a pole of order mm at z0z_0:

Res(f,z0)=1(m1)!limzz0dm1dzm1[(zz0)mf(z)]\mathrm{Res}(f, z_0) = \frac{1}{(m-1)!}\lim_{z \to z_0} \frac{d^{m-1}}{dz^{m-1}}\left[(z - z_0)^m f(z)\right]

Solution

Problem. Find the residue of f(z)=zz2+4z+3f(z) = \frac{z}{z^2 + 4z + 3} at each pole.

z2+4z+3=(z+1)(z+3)z^2 + 4z + 3 = (z + 1)(z + 3) So simple poles at z=1z = -1 and z=3z = -3.

At z=1z = -1: Res=limz1zz+3=12\mathrm{Res} = \lim_{z \to -1} \frac{z}{z + 3} = \frac{-1}{2}. At z=3z = -3: Res=limz3zz+1=32=32\mathrm{Res} = \lim_{z \to -3} \frac{z}{z + 1} = \frac{-3}{-2} = \frac{3}{2}.

Problem. Find the residue of f(z)=ez(z1)2(z2)f(z) = \frac{e^z}{(z - 1)^2(z - 2)} at each pole.

At z=1z = 1 (pole of order 22): Res=ddz[ezz2]z=1=ez(z2)ez(z2)2z=1=ee1=2e\mathrm{Res} = \frac{d}{dz}\left[\frac{e^z}{z - 2}\right]_{z=1} = \frac{e^z(z - 2) - e^z}{(z-2)^2}\Big|_{z=1} = \frac{-e - e}{1} = -2e.

At z=2z = 2 (simple pole): Res=e2(21)2=e2\mathrm{Res} = \frac{e^2}{(2-1)^2} = e^2.

Theorem 8.4 (Residue Theorem). If ff is analytic inside and on a simple closed positively Oriented contour γ\gamma except for isolated singularities z1,z2,,znz_1, z_2, \ldots, z_n inside γ\gamma Then

γf(z)dz=2πik=1nRes(f,zk)\int_\gamma f(z)\, dz = 2\pi i \sum_{k=1}^{n} \mathrm{Res}(f, z_k)

Proof. For each singularity zkz_kDraw a small circle γk\gamma_k around it. By Cauchy’s theorem Applied to the multiply connected region between γ\gamma and the γk\gamma_k:

γfdz=k=1nγkfdz=k=1n2πiRes(f,zk)\int_\gamma f\, dz = \sum_{k=1}^n \int_{\gamma_k} f\, dz = \sum_{k=1}^n 2\pi i \cdot \mathrm{Res}(f, z_k). \blacksquare

Solution

Problem 1. Evaluate γezz(z1)2dz\int_\gamma \frac{e^z}{z(z-1)^2}\, dz where γ\gamma is z=2|z| = 2.

Solution. Singularities inside γ\gamma: z=0z = 0 (simple pole) and z=1z = 1 (pole of order 22).

At z=0z = 0: Res=limz0ez(z1)2=1(1)2=1\mathrm{Res} = \lim_{z \to 0} \frac{e^z}{(z-1)^2} = \frac{1}{(-1)^2} = 1.

At z=1z = 1: Res(f,1)=ddz[(z1)2ezz(z1)2]z=1=ddz[ezz]z=1=ezzezz2z=1=ee1=0\mathrm{Res}(f, 1) = \frac{d}{dz}\left[(z-1)^2 \cdot \frac{e^z}{z(z-1)^2}\right]_{z=1} = \frac{d}{dz}\left[\frac{e^z}{z}\right]_{z=1} = \frac{e^z \cdot z - e^z}{z^2}\Big|_{z=1} = \frac{e - e}{1} = 0.

γfdz=2πi(1+0)=2πi\int_\gamma f\, dz = 2\pi i(1 + 0) = 2\pi i. \blacksquare

Problem 2. Evaluate γ1z4+1dz\int_\gamma \frac{1}{z^4 + 1}\, dz where γ\gamma is z=2|z| = 2.

Solution. The poles are the fourth roots of 1-1: zk=eiπ/4+ikπ/2z_k = e^{i\pi/4 + ik\pi/2} for k=0,1,2,3k = 0, 1, 2, 3. All four lie inside z=2|z| = 2.

Each is a simple pole with Res(f,zk)=14zk3\mathrm{Res}(f, z_k) = \frac{1}{4z_k^3}. Since zk4=1z_k^4 = -1: zk3=zkz_k^{-3} = -z_k So the sum equals 14zk=0-\frac{1}{4}\sum z_k = 0.

γdzz4+1=2πi0=0\int_\gamma \frac{dz}{z^4 + 1} = 2\pi i \cdot 0 = 0. \blacksquare

flowchart TD
A[8_Singularities And Residue Theory] --> B[Key Concepts]
A --> C[Core Principles]
A --> D[Practical Applications]
B --> E[Fundamental definitions]
C --> F[Design patterns]
D --> G[Real-world usage]

Singularities are points where a holomorphic function misbehaves — it either blows up, has a limit, or oscillates infinitely. The Laurent series decomposes a function near a singularity into a regular part (non-negative powers) and a principal part (negative powers). The residue is the coefficient of 1/(zz0)1/(z - z_0), and it captures the “amount of singularity” in a precise sense. The residue theorem says that the integral around a closed curve equals 2πi2\pi i times the sum of residues inside — integrating around a singularity picks up a topological quantity that depends only on what is inside, not on the exact path. This converts hard integration problems into bookkeeping.

Mistake 1: Confusing the residue with the coefficient a1a_{-1}. The residue of ff at an isolated singularity z0z_0 is the coefficient a1a_{-1} in the Laurent series expansion f(z)=n=an(zz0)nf(z) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} a_n (z - z_0)^n. Do not confuse this with other coefficients or with the value of the function at the singularity.

Mistake 2: Forgetting to check if singularities are inside the contour. When using the residue theorem, only include singularities that lie inside the contour. A singularity on the contour makes the integral undefined (or requires a principal value). Always check the location of each singularity relative to the contour.

Mistake 3: Misclassifying a removable singularity as a pole. A removable singularity has no principal part in its Laurent series. If limzz0(zz0)mf(z)=0\lim_{z \to z_0} (z - z_0)^m f(z) = 0 for all m1m \geq 1, then z0z_0 is removable. Do not assume that a function with a limit at a singularity is removable; the limit must exist and be finite.

Mistake 4: Forgetting the factor of 2πi2\pi i in the residue theorem. The residue theorem states that γf(z)dz=2πiRes(f,zk)\int_\gamma f(z)\, dz = 2\pi i \sum \mathrm{Res}(f, z_k), where the sum is over singularities inside γ\gamma. Forgetting the 2πi2\pi i factor is a common error. Always include it when computing contour integrals.

Mistake 5: Confusing the order of a pole with the residue. The residue at a pole of order mm is given by Res(f,z0)=1(m1)!limzz0dm1dzm1[(zz0)mf(z)]\mathrm{Res}(f, z_0) = \frac{1}{(m-1)!} \lim_{z \to z_0} \frac{d^{m-1}}{dz^{m-1}} [(z - z_0)^m f(z)]. Do not assume that the residue is zero at a pole of order greater than one; it can be non-zero.