Closed Sets, Closure, Interior, and Boundary
3.1 Closed Sets
Section titled “3.1 Closed Sets”Definition. A subset is closed if its complement is open.
Proposition 3.1. Closed sets satisfy:
- and are closed.
- Any intersection of closed sets is closed.
- Any finite union of closed sets is closed.
Proof. By De Morgan’s laws, complements turn intersections into unions and unions into intersections: and .
(1) and are open.
(2) Each is open, so is open; the open-set axioms allow arbitrary unions; hence is closed.
(3) Each is open and there are only finitely many, so is open; the axioms allow finite intersections; hence is closed.
The asymmetry between (2) and (3) mirrors the open-set axioms exactly: open sets are closed under arbitrary unions and finite intersections, so closed sets are closed under arbitrary intersections and finite unions. This is why an infinite union of closed sets can fail to be closed: , which is not closed.
Example 3.1. In with the standard topology, is closed since is open.
Example 3.2. Sets can be both open and closed (clopen). In the discrete topology every set is clopen. In any topological space, and are clopen.
Example 3.3. Sets can be neither open nor closed. In , is neither open nor closed.
3.2 Closure
Section titled “3.2 Closure”Definition. The closure of , denoted , is the smallest closed set containing :
Equivalently, if and only if every open set containing intersects .
Proof of the equivalence. If , then; since is the intersection of all closed ; there is a closed set with and . Then is open, contains , and . Conversely, if some open satisfies , then is closed, contains , and excludes ; it is one of the sets in the family whose intersection defines , so .
This characterisation makes the closure local: membership in is decided by arbitrarily small neighbourhoods of a single point, not by any global property of .
Example 3.4. In : , .
Example 3.5. In with the standard topology, the closure of the open unit disc is the closed unit disc .
3.3 Interior
Section titled “3.3 Interior”Definition. The interior of , denoted or , is the largest open set contained in :
Equivalently, if and only if there exists an open set with .
Proposition 3.3 (Interior—closure duality). For any :
Proof. Using the pointwise characterisation of closure just proved: if and only if some open has ; that is, - that is, . This is the first identity. Substituting for gives the second.
Alternatively, argue directly for the second: means no open neighbourhood of fits inside , which means every open neighbourhood of meets , which means .
The duality says the two operations are the same operation seen through complementation; closure builds the smallest closed superset exactly as interior builds the largest open subset. Any theorem about one converts into a theorem about the other, which is how part (2) of Proposition 3.4 below is obtained from part (1) for free.
Example 3.6. In : , .
3.4 Boundary
Section titled “3.4 Boundary”Definition. The boundary of , denoted , is:
Proof of the identity of the two descriptions. Apply Proposition 3.3 to : . Therefore .
The symmetric definition makes immediate: the boundary belongs to the set and its complement equally.
Example 3.7. In : , , .
3.5 Dense Sets
Section titled “3.5 Dense Sets”Definition. A subset is dense in if .
Example 3.8. is dense in with the standard topology.
Example 3.9. In the cofinite topology on an infinite set , every infinite subset is dense.
Proposition 3.2. is dense in if and only if every nonempty open set intersects .
Proof. Suppose and let be open. Pick a point ; then is an open neighbourhood of , and , so the pointwise characterisation forces .
Conversely, suppose every nonempty open set meets , and let be arbitrary. Every open neighbourhood of is in particular nonempty and open, so ; the characterisation gives . Since was arbitrary, .
3.6 The Algebra of Closure and Interior
Section titled “3.6 The Algebra of Closure and Interior”Proposition 3.4. For :
- .
- .
- and , and both inclusions can be strict.
Proof. (1) If then every closed also has , so : closure is monotone. Monotonicity gives and , hence . Conversely is closed (Proposition 3.1(3)) and contains , so by definition of as the smallest such set, .
(2) By the duality of Proposition 3.3, applied twice, and part (1):
(3) gives , and similarly . For strictness take , , : both closures equal , so , while and hence . The interior inclusion is the dual statement (substitute complements in what was just shown, using Proposition 3.3), and the same example shows it strict: but .
The failure in (3) is not a technicality; it is the formal reason a boundary can be large. Since , the rationals have : every point of is simultaneously a limit of rationals and of irrationals. Only a separation hypothesis between the two sets (for instance , or positive distance in a metric space) can restore equality in (3).
3.7 The Kuratowski Closure Axioms
Section titled “3.7 The Kuratowski Closure Axioms”Closure is not just an operation on subsets; it determines the topology. Kuratowski isolated which axioms an operator must satisfy to be a closure operator, and the answer is four.
Proposition 3.5. The closure operator satisfies:
- (K1) (idempotence);
- (K2) (additivity);
- (K3) (extensivity);
- (K4) (groundedness).
Conversely, any operator satisfying (K1)–(K4) is the closure operator of exactly one topology on , namely .
Proof. The four axioms for : (K3) holds because every set in the family whose intersection defines contains . (K4) holds because is itself closed (Proposition 3.1(1)), so the defining family includes and the intersection is contained in it. (K2) is Proposition 3.4(1). For (K1): is a closed set containing , so it is a member of the family defining , giving ; the reverse inclusion is (K3) applied to .
For the converse, first derive monotonicity from (K2): if then , so , hence . Call -closed if ; these are the closed sets of by construction. The family of -closed sets is nonempty ( by (K3), so is -closed, and is -closed by (K4)), and it is closed under arbitrary intersections: if with each -closed, monotonicity gives for every , so , and (K3) gives equality. Hence is a topology.
Finally, the closure operator of maps to the smallest -closed set containing . The set is -closed by (K1) and contains by (K3). And any -closed satisfies by monotonicity. So is that smallest set; the closure operator of is exactly , and since the closed sets of are the fixed points of , the topology is unique.
Example 3.10. On , the operator with , , , satisfies (K1)–(K4). The topology it generates is ; the Sierpiński space of the next sections (with the open point). Note : the point is not closed, which is exactly the failure of .
Key Relationships
Section titled “Key Relationships”| Operation | Definition | Notation | Duality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closure | Smallest closed superset | ||
| Interior | Largest open subset | ||
| Boundary | Points in both closure and complement’s closure | ||
| Exterior | Interior of complement |
Common Pitfalls
Section titled “Common Pitfalls”- Closed is not the opposite of open: A set can be both open and closed (clopen), or neither. In with the standard topology, and are clopen; is neither.
- Closure depends on the ambient space: has closure in , but in with the lower-limit topology, the closure includes additional limit points. The closure operation is relative to the topology.
- Boundary points need not belong to the set: in , but neither 0 nor 1 is in . The boundary of an open set is always contained in its complement.
- Dense sets can have empty interior: is dense in yet has empty interior. A dense set has full closure but may be “full of holes” topologically.
- Finite union vs infinite intersection: Closed sets are only guaranteed closed under finite unions. An infinite union of closed sets (e.g., ) may not be closed.
Worked Example: Closure and Boundary in Subspace Topology
Section titled “Worked Example: Closure and Boundary in Subspace Topology”Problem. Let . Find , , and in with the standard topology.
Solution. is a line segment on the -axis, open at 0 and closed at 1.
- : The point is a limit point because every neighbourhood contains points of .
- : No open ball in is contained in a line segment.
- : Every point of is also a boundary point since every neighbourhood contains points both in and .
This illustrates that a set with empty interior is entirely contained in its boundary.
Applications
Section titled “Applications”- Continuous functions on dense subsets: If two continuous functions agree on a dense subset , then everywhere. This is fundamental in analysis for extending functions.
- Baire category theorem: Complete metric spaces cannot be expressed as a countable union of nowhere dense sets. This theorem underlies proofs of existence of continuous nowhere differentiable functions.
- Closure in function spaces: The Stone—Weierstrass theorem characterises dense subalgebras of , enabling polynomial approximation of continuous functions.
- Manifold boundaries: The topological boundary of a manifold with boundary is distinct from its manifold boundary. For an -manifold with boundary, as a topological space is an -manifold without boundary.
Connections to Other Topics
Section titled “Connections to Other Topics”- Analysis: The closure operation is essential for defining compactness (every open cover has a finite subcover) and the Heine—Borel theorem.
- Algebraic topology: The boundary operator in singular homology is defined using topological boundaries of simplices.
- Functional analysis: The closure of a subspace in a normed space is central to the Hahn—Banach theorem and the definition of the dual space.
- Differential geometry: The interior and boundary of a manifold with boundary are defined analogously, using charts to .
Worked Example: Density of Polynomials
Section titled “Worked Example: Density of Polynomials”Problem. Show that the set of polynomials is dense in (continuous functions on ) under the supremum norm.
Solution. By the Stone—Weierstrass theorem, any subalgebra of that separates points and contains constant functions is dense. The polynomials form a subalgebra, contain constants, and separate points (the polynomial distinguishes ). Therefore .
In the language of closure: the closure of the polynomials in the sup-norm topology is the entire space of continuous functions. Every continuous function on can be approximated uniformly by a sequence of polynomials (Weierstrass approximation theorem).
Summary Table
Section titled “Summary Table”| Operation | Property 1 | Property 2 | Property 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dense | intersects every nonempty open set | has empty interior |
Intuition
Section titled “Intuition”Think of a set as a region of space with fuzzy edges. The interior is the core where you can move freely in any direction. The closure adds back all the limit points that were arbitrarily close. The boundary is the fuzzy edge itself, where every neighborhood contains both points inside and outside the set. Dense sets are like scattered dust that gets arbitrarily close to every point, even though the dust itself has no interior. These operations form a dual pair: closure and interior are negations of each other when applied to complements, reflecting the fundamental symmetry between open and closed sets.
Cross-References
Section titled “Cross-References”Metric Spaces: Closure, interior, and boundary can be characterised using sequences and limits in metric spaces.
Separation Axioms: Dense sets and closure properties are used to prove Urysohn’s lemma and the Tietze extension theorem.
Introduction to Algebraic Topology: The boundary operator in algebraic topology generalises the topological boundary concept to higher dimensions.
Common Pitfalls: Confusing open with closed and misunderstanding closure under infinite operations are frequent errors.